However, they aggressively *rewrite* those drafts.
How to rewrite bad writing š
After rewriting 400,000 words on my site...
Advice for blog posts, tweets, emails:
However, they aggressively *rewrite* those drafts.
Your second draft is for identifying the best ideas then making them resonate.
The enemy of rewriting is being precious about what you originally said and how you originally said it.
You need to be willing to destroy.
Readers don't assess the quality of nonfiction by its elegance nor its complexity.
Instead, they assess:
[How strong your ideas are] x [how intuitively they understand them]
Unclear sentences distract from that understanding.
Write sentences that a thirteen-year-old could follow.
If they can understand you, so can everyone else.
That isn't to say children should understand the details.
Rather, children must be able to follow the logic of every argument.
⢠You use plain phrasing.
⢠You use fewer ideas per sentence.
Use these techniques in your writing too.
"The obstacle facing media organizations is to chart an economically sustainable course through a landscape of commodity journalism.ā
āNews companies are having a hard time staying in business because anyone with a blog or Twitter account can report the news now."
By removing overhead, the underlying point stands out.ā
The complexity of your writing should emerge from the strength of its ideasānot the wording.
āThe next step is rewriting for succinctness.
Remove everything you now realize is not required to make your point.
A post can be 50,000 words, but if it's dense with insights and devoid of rambling, it's succinct.
For each section of your post:
⢠Read all its paragraphs.
⢠Take an hour-long break.
⢠Rewrite the section from memoryāfocusing only on key points.
The fluff falls away when you focus on trying to effectively re-articulate your idea.
⢠Have them read your draft.
⢠Ask them to summarize it over the phone in thirty seconds.
⢠Delete your draft and restart from their summary.
⢠Add more words only as needed to make your point resonate.
The art of rewriting is the art of becoming self-aware about the purpose of every word you've written.
⢠Remove ideas that aren't critical to the central point.
⢠Don't describe what doesn't need to be described.
"To be brief on the sentence-level, remove words that donāt add necessary context. Extra words cause readers to slow down and do extra work. That makes it harder for them to recognize the sentenceās point. And when you exhaust readers, they quit reading."
"Your sentence is brief when no additional words can be removed. Being succinct is important because filler buries your talking points and bores readers into quitting."
Bingo.
Clarity and succinctness are what help ideas resonate. They reduce the friction of reading.
But itās *intrigue* that gets people to read in the first place.
1. Novelty ā A claim that's counter-intuitive, counter-narrative, surprising, or elegantly poetic.
Novelty = New info that readers would not have easily intuited on their own.
Tease readers with a question you don't answer until later.
If you weave (1) novelty and (2) withhold information, readers are likely to remain engaged.
@waitbutwhy is great at this.
⢠Ask feedback-givers to highlight every sentence that gives them a dopamine hit. Those are the moments of novelty: "Ahh, that's interesting."
⢠For each hit, increase a counter at the end of its sentence. Like this (3).
⢠Rinse and repeat until your article has a steady cadence of dopamine hits.
I want you to consider two psychological principles.
1. The hook principle ā "A captivating intro buys goodwill with readers so they overlook an imperfect middle."
The peak-end rule ā āPeople judge an experience largely based on how they felt at its most intense point and at its end. This implies they do not judge the experience based on the average of every moment.ā
1. Have a captivating intro that buys goodwill.
2. Have at least one sustained peak of insight or surprise.
3. Have an ending that satisfyingly justifies why the piece was worth reading.
⢠Use simple wording and simple sentences.
⢠Simple language doesn't weaken ideas. It strengthens them by helping what matters stand out.
⢠Evenly distribute dopamine hits. Rely on feedback; it's hard to judge this yourself.
If you want more writing content, you can give me a follow and turn on notifications.
See my past threads here:
@julian
āNeil Gaiman (@neilhimself)
For specifics, see my handbook.
It's free, and I have nothing to sell you:
https://t.co/BJkEXDWUxr
More from Julian Shapiro
You May Also Like
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
1/ š Excited to share what weāve been building at https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t + we are going to tweetstorm our progress every week!
Week 1 highlights: getting shortlisted for YC W2019š¤, acquiring a premium domainš°, meeting Substack's @hamishmckenzie and Stripe CEO @patrickc š¤©
2/ So what is Brew?
brew / bru : / to make (beer, coffee etc.) / verb: begin to develop š±
A place for you to enjoy premium content while supporting your favorite creators. Sort of like a āConsumer-facing Patreonā cc @jackconte
(weāre still working on the pitch)
3/ So, why be so transparent? Two words: launch strategy.
jk š a) I loooove doing something consistently for a long period of time b) limited downside and infinite upside (feedback, accountability, reach).
cc @altimor, @pmarca
4/ https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t domain š»
It started with a cold email. Guess what? He was using BuyMeACoffee on his blog, and was excited to hear about what we're building next. Within 2w, we signed the deal at @Escrowcom's SF office. Youāre a pleasure to work with @MichaelCyger!
5/ @ycombinator's invite for the in-person interview arrived that evening. Quite a day!
Thanks @patio11 for the thoughtful feedback on our YC application, and @gabhubert for your directions on positioning the product ā set the tone for our pitch!
Week 1 highlights: getting shortlisted for YC W2019š¤, acquiring a premium domainš°, meeting Substack's @hamishmckenzie and Stripe CEO @patrickc š¤©
2/ So what is Brew?
brew / bru : / to make (beer, coffee etc.) / verb: begin to develop š±
A place for you to enjoy premium content while supporting your favorite creators. Sort of like a āConsumer-facing Patreonā cc @jackconte
(weāre still working on the pitch)
3/ So, why be so transparent? Two words: launch strategy.
jk š a) I loooove doing something consistently for a long period of time b) limited downside and infinite upside (feedback, accountability, reach).
cc @altimor, @pmarca
4/ https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t domain š»
It started with a cold email. Guess what? He was using BuyMeACoffee on his blog, and was excited to hear about what we're building next. Within 2w, we signed the deal at @Escrowcom's SF office. Youāre a pleasure to work with @MichaelCyger!
5/ @ycombinator's invite for the in-person interview arrived that evening. Quite a day!
Thanks @patio11 for the thoughtful feedback on our YC application, and @gabhubert for your directions on positioning the product ā set the tone for our pitch!
Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.