60 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BEARERS & WOMEN OF QURAN
A THREAD 🧵
3. She concentrates on her own situation, having the aspiration to reform whatever is corrupt in her affairs, guarding her tongue and choosing her words.
5. If she remains silent, she remains silent with knowledge when she sees silence to be correct.
6. She rarely delves into that which does not conern her.
8. She imprisons her tongue the way she imprisons her enemy, so that she may be safe from its evil and bad consequences.
10. If she is pleased by something in accordance with the truth, she smiles.
11. She dislikes joking, fearing frivolity; if she jokes, she speaks the truth.
13. She does not allow herself to be praised for qualities she has, how then for qualities she does not have?
15. She does not backbite anyone.
16. She does not look down upon anyone.
17. She does not abuse anyone.
18. She is not happy at the affliction of others.
20. She does not think the worst about anyone, except fo one who deserves it.
21. She loves with knowledge, and hates with knowledge.
23. She made the Qur'an, Sunnah and Fiqh her guide to every good and beautiful quality, guarding all her limbs from what has been forbidden.
25. If she sists, she sists with knowledge.
26. She strives hard so that people may be safe from her tongue and hands.
💎 27. She does not behave ignorantly: if someone behaves ignorantly towards her, she is forbearing.
29. She does not trangress: if she is trangressed upon, she has patience.
30. She restrains her fury to please her Lord and enrage her enemy.
💎 32. She seeks status from Allah, not from the creatures.
33. She despises arrogance, fearing for her self from it.
35. She follows the obligations of the Quran and the sunnah:
☆ she eats food with knowledge
☆ she drinks with knowledge
☆ she dresses with knowledge
☆ she sleeps with knowledge
☆ she accompanies his brothers with knowledge
☆ visiting them with knowledge
☆ seeking permission to enter upon them with knowledge,
☆ greeting them with knowledge
☆ she treats her neighbour with knowledge
☆ she lowers her wings to them
☆ she lowers her voice before their voices
☆ she expends her wealth for them
☆ she looks upon them with the eye of respect and mercy
☆ she is thankful for them in old age
☆ she is not irritated by them
☆ she does not look down upon them
☆ if they ask for her help in a matter of obedience, she helps them
☆ she is gentle with them in her disobedience of them
☆ she shows beautiful etiquette such that they may return from the ugly matter they intended that is does befit them to do.
38. If someone breaks off relations with her, she does not break off relations with them.
💎 39. If someone disobeys Allah regarding her, she obeys Allah regarding them.
41. She benefits those who accompany her, being an excellent companion for those whom she sits with.
42. If she teaches another, she is gentle with them.
💎 44. She is gentle in all her matters, extremely patient in teaching goodness.
45. The learner finds comfort in her, and the one sitting with her is joyous at her company.
47. She educates her companions with the etiquettes of the Quran and the Sunnah.
48. If she is afflicted with a difficulty, the Qur'an and the Sunnah are two educators for her.
49. She grieves with knowledge.
51. She has patience with knowledge.
52. She purifies herself with knowledge.
53. She prays with knowledge.
54. She gives Zakah and charity with knowledge.
55. She fasts with knowledge.
56. She performs pilgrimage with knowledge.
More from Religion
"Hinduism was one of the world's most easy-going faith traditions, famed for it's non-persecutory history."
I can assure you, it is NOT.
It is neither easy-going, nor non-persecutory. In fact it is the very opposite.
Thread.
Modern Hinduism is a British colonial concept, created in concert with Brahmins, who are at the "apex" of the caste system. The word "Hindoo" in fact, is of Persian origin, meaning a person who lives in the Indus valley.
Colonialists who attempted to study Indian religion in the 18th century (NOT, at the time, Hinduism) were baffled by it. Strata of people living distinctly (the caste system) with overlapping gods didn't fit into their Judeo-Christian understanding of religion.
Which has an ecclesiastical authority, a holy book etc., which Indian religions lacked. In studying "The Hindoo", colonialists prioritized textual sources of knowledge, which is where Brahmins, the priestly caste with a monopoly over education/text come in.
Brahminism was a distinct "religion" (although i don't really want to use the term in this way) that was frankly terrorized of other castes. In fact, the very basis of Brahminism is oppression. Brahmins had scholars who recorded *Brahminical* canon textually.
I can assure you, it is NOT.
It is neither easy-going, nor non-persecutory. In fact it is the very opposite.
Thread.
Hinduism was historically one of the world's most easy-going faith traditions, famed for its non-persecutory history. Now this ... pic.twitter.com/Obln4cns7b
— David Frum (@davidfrum) February 3, 2021
Modern Hinduism is a British colonial concept, created in concert with Brahmins, who are at the "apex" of the caste system. The word "Hindoo" in fact, is of Persian origin, meaning a person who lives in the Indus valley.
Colonialists who attempted to study Indian religion in the 18th century (NOT, at the time, Hinduism) were baffled by it. Strata of people living distinctly (the caste system) with overlapping gods didn't fit into their Judeo-Christian understanding of religion.
Which has an ecclesiastical authority, a holy book etc., which Indian religions lacked. In studying "The Hindoo", colonialists prioritized textual sources of knowledge, which is where Brahmins, the priestly caste with a monopoly over education/text come in.
Brahminism was a distinct "religion" (although i don't really want to use the term in this way) that was frankly terrorized of other castes. In fact, the very basis of Brahminism is oppression. Brahmins had scholars who recorded *Brahminical* canon textually.
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
