President Kennedy’s family are either incredibly accident prone or possibly, and this is just my supposition, there was an underlying plot by the de*ep state to remove every Kennedy that they...
1 “Amazing Juan O'Savin Video: America's New Day Dawning, the Rebirth of America" 12.21
When Senator Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated on June 6, 1968, Jacqueline Kennedy cried out, “If they’re killing Kennedys, then my children are targets. I want to get out of this country.”
President Kennedy’s family are either incredibly accident prone or possibly, and this is just my supposition, there was an underlying plot by the de*ep state to remove every Kennedy that they...
How can I make that claim?
Because both the de*ep state and the Alliance are in possession of Looking Glass technology. This advanced off-world tech enables one to see into everything: Akashic records, future, past,...
Gene Decode reported that POTUS was in a SCIF Election Night watching the Election fraud take place on Quantum Computers and that this was the second time the Alliance had watched the fraud. They’d already...
This technology could also explain why Q’s posts are so eerily accurate.
It is my theory that, perhaps, when the ca_bal looked into future timelines they could see that an essential...
What are the facts?
John F. Kennedy Jr.’s uncle, Joseph P. Kennedy Jr., died in a plane crash in 1944.
John’s aunt, Kathleen “Kick” Cavendish, died in a plane crash in 1948.
The parents of John’s aunt Ethel, George...
Johns’ father, President John F. Kennedy, was assassinated in 1963.
John’s uncle, Senator Edward Kennedy, narrowly escaped death in a 1964 plane crash.
John’s uncle, Senator Robert Kennedy, was assassinated in 1968.
I can understand one plane crash occurring in a family. Maybe even two. But five plane crashes in one family defies belief. It...
What does this have to do with Juan O’Savin?
Many believe Juan is JFK.
As I’ve written many times now, Colleen and Charlie Freak are convinced...
I’m willing to believe JFK staged his own death, especially if he’d been a de*ep state target his whole life. A dramatic exit off the world stage would have been a brilliant...
Having listened to a number Juan O’Savin interviews I am convinced of one thing: He sounds more and more like Q, or certainly one of the Q’s.
Juan O’Savin has an exceptional gift for being able...
As well, Robert Steele attests that Juan has uncommon knowledge when it comes to Numerology, Astrology & Spirituality, all areas in which Q particularly communicates in coded drops.
I don’t know Juan’s true identity, but it’s fun to speculate.
Meanwhile, in a 12-20-20 Podcast interview, President Trump said, “Merry Christmas. We’re getting closer and closer and I hope you let everybody know—we’re actually very close.”
More from 🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸
More from Politics
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
