“The chances that you could ever see 123,000 votes in a row for the same person are – you could go pick a grain of sand on a beach and I could go pick a grain of sand on another beach and the chances that we picked the same grain is as close to you can get to zero.
Continued thread 3
1/21
“The chances that you would have 1,000 votes in a row would be something like 2 quadrillion-to-1 against.
“The chances that you could ever see 123,000 votes in a row for the same person are – you could go pick a grain of sand on a beach and I could go pick a grain of sand on another beach and the chances that we picked the same grain is as close to you can get to zero.
So, the point is that these three things line up: Bucket #1. The technical capabilities of the machines; Bucket #2. The lived experience of the people who went & voted in these districts &; Bucket #3. The statistical results – all dovetail together & tell this ironclad story
“You’ve gotta prove ‘Could it happen?’ and ‘Did it happen?’ The question of ‘Could it happen?’ is addressed by Bucket #1, that the machines have this functionality. The question of ‘Did it happen?’ is proven by Buckets #2 and #3, the lived experience of the people who lived
and voted in these precincts and the statistical outcomes all prove it did happen.
“So, together, all that information fits hand-in-glove, perfectly.”
Regarding the piles of blank ballots reported shipped in, Byrne says, “We have hundreds of affadavits of people who saw different glimpses of different things and when you put all those affadavits together, that’s exactly what you get.
- NO WIDESPREAD FRAUD IS TRUE – IT WAS NARROW AND DEEP -
“Here’s the big thing, it’s gonna make you puke – the Democrats are right about something – so, I’m not a Republican, but I’m REALLY not a Democrat.
“Democrats who’ve been saying, ‘There was no evidence of widespread fraud’ are missing the point. But they’re right, it wasn’t that it was widespread – it was narrow and deep – and the Bad Guys picked six places to do it.
“What they realized, was that if you cheated like crazy in 6 counties in America, you could flip the states that they’re in and hence, flip the Electoral College and hence, steal the Nation, by flipping 6 counties.
& those are Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, Maricopa & Clark County, in Nevada. “Those 6 counties – & the first 4 of them are heavily Black & I believe they did that, because I think the goons on the Left have been using the Black community for my entire lifetime
“It isn’t that the Black people cheated. The people who cheated were the people running the systems and maybe people over in China and other places did the cheating. The Black people just did the voting.
They did that, so when all this gets exposed, they’re gonna say, ‘Oh! You’re trying to suppress the Black Vote!’ “Well, I will have nothing to do with any racial element. I’m a huge anti-racist…
what they’re going to try to do, as they always do, is to hide behind Black people…The Bad Guys cheated the Hell out of these 4 predominantly Black cities and then Maricopa, Phoenix, which is Hispanic.”
- THE PATH TO VICTORY -
Byrne says he’s had enough evidence to win these cases for over 17 days. Now, it’s just a matter of explaining the details to the lawyers to whom he’s made his information available, as a concerned citizen,
who’s paying his own way and who is neither working for the Trump Campaign nor for Sidney Powell. “There’s no honest judge in America who wouldn’t get it. It’s open-and-shut. The only question, at this point is the whole legal process –
and the Bad Guys are trying to pour cement over this whole election and bury it before any of this stuff gets out. But it’s open-and-shut that this happened on a massive scale.”
He says blockchain cryptography cold solve all of this, where we would no longer rely on these Government employees who can be – and who are – bought.
“The Goldman-Sachs of the world can buy themselves regulators and senators and congressmen and journalists and maybe judges but there’s one thing that even Goldman-Sachs can’t buy and that’s the laws of mathematics.
So, the more that we base on the laws of mathematics, which is to say cryptography, which is to say blockchain, the more we solve this problem of corruption…
More from Politics
My piece in the NY Times today: "the Trump administration is denying applications submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at a rate 37 percent higher than the Obama administration did in 2016."
Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016." https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh
"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."
Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”
My conclusion:
Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016." https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh
"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."
Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”
My conclusion:
