All these are Pharma sector companies. Company F consistently reports -ve cash flows. It's stock price never compounded. All other examples reported multi-years of +ve cash flow generation. These stocks have been multi-baggers over the years.

Focus on Cash Flows vs News Flows.

More from Sajal Kapoor

More from Pharma

Indian Pharma Dream 11 Q-compliance ranking: (1st Edition July 2021)
1.Natco (Captain)
2.Neuland (Vice-Captain)
3. Alkem (WB)
4.Cipla(Team coach)
5. Lupin
6. Laurus
7. Hikal
8.Cadila
9.Sun
10.Alembic
11. Unichem
12.Torrent
13. DRL
14. Strides
15.Wockhardt
Investors review tip👇


a) Whenever any major regulatory inspection happens at mfg sites of:
a) #1 to #7, remain fully assured of a success
b)#8 to #13, read Hanuman chalisaa or any sacred book as per faith every day till the inspection lasts.
c) #14 and #15 sell ur position and pick anyone of Dream 11

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?