#NMDC the first targets done. 25% in one trading week. If the stocks breaks today low, watch out. A move above todays high - bigger targets open up.
#NMDC the stock is at supports. A clean break out above 160, this could do well. My stops on this one could be 148, if the break out get triggered#Dare2DRM #Watchlist pic.twitter.com/pGG7qj5IhP
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 1, 2021
More from Dare2Dream

#Indiamart Update : The correction in the stock could be over. Stock holding good supports. Watch for upside momentum as #Unlock plays out. My SL here would be 6650 levels#Dare2Drm pic.twitter.com/JLwujVPcl0
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) June 13, 2021
More from Nmdc
NMDC (cmp154) has broken 7 years of falling resistance line supply zone with strong volumes ...140 strong support zone looks good in short to medium term
— Ashish Chaturmohta (@AshishChatur) April 30, 2021
China is discouraging exports, looking to support domestic demand while restricting supply to reduce emissions. pic.twitter.com/lrfHdOiZXx
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.

4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.