#NiFTY_50(17185)
Circle Mark is minimum goal on 60 minutes chart.
#Perspective

More from Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) मैंSchedule Tribe)
Objective is to move higher towards
3.618% - 4.236% and 4.618%
#Probability
#IEX
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) April 20, 2021
On sustain rise above 347 upside shown in chart up to 4.618%(521)
And 6.857%(718).
View valid till 233 not violated. @UdayJad39389920 pic.twitter.com/I2MoPlwXRW
More from Nifty
Low made 17129.55
Objective 0.382% (17181) #done.
If nifty not sustain above today and high and gap remain gap than more downside open till Fibonacci retracement
0.50%(16893) and 0.618%(16604
#Probability
#NiFTY_50(17475)
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) April 17, 2022
Daily chart and monthly chart.
Dail chart show Fibonacci retracement level 1st 0.236% done.
Next objetive is to test 2nd 0.382%17181 during the entire week and close near to it.#MACD#RSI pic.twitter.com/Bt9bJuHDFh
Till it breakouts expect pendulum swings within this structure.
I am positive for 19300-20000 above 18350.
Bottoms 16800-17000 in place and 200dema at 16600. Dont see any big cut. @moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/lceGFlDyRM

#Nifty taking a shape of triangle rather than CNH.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) January 29, 2022
Confirmation point is same 18350 and targets also same as below \U0001f447
Traingle /CNH whats in a name as long as targets and Confirmation point is same. https://t.co/vfM1odTd94
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.