For some non-Covid news, and as a bit of recent political history, I’ve been released more than 100 pages of internal press office communications relating to the Home Office’s fried chicken box saga.

You may remember back in heady 2019 that there was an uproar after the government provided takeaway boxes with anti-knife crime messages to chicken shops around the country.
The campaign faced an immediate backlash, with critics questioning why fried chicken shops — stereotypically associated with young black communities — were being targeted by the Home Office for this campaign against knife crime.
The emails I’ve been released show that privately, officials admitted that the outcry risked angering the communities the campaign was trying to reach out to.
A briefing prepared by a Home Office official highlighted that they were “unsure what could be done publicly” to rebuff the criticism, and that the campaign’s focus on chicken boxes had created a perception that the campaign had “publicised racist stereotypes”.
“This theme of institutional racism and an out of touch approach that demonises communities will potentially enrage many of the communities we are trying to build trust with,” the official said.
Instead of the Home Office considering the criticism, it appeared to double down, rather than exploring what had gone wrong with the messaging, with many emails flying in the wake of @DavidLammy tweeting concerns about the campaign.
The department’s press team faced the task of finding voices to support the department’s position as outrage exploded across social media by "bashing the phones".
Other emails complained that centre-right publications such as the Mail and Telegraph “have written up stories about the criticism, and while we have provided our background lines, that they are not entirely represented in the pieces”.
Despite initially being the public face of the policy, Kit Malthouse, then minister of State for Crime and Policing, was shielded from media contact.
“Given the circumstances today, we are planning to decline all bids that we have received for the Policing Minister to speak on the #knifefree chicken boxes”, the emails state, with a staffer agreeing with the decision with a one word response, “decline”.
A bid from #GoodMorningBritain was refused on the grounds that it would likely “see the story run for a second consecutive day, with coverage again focussed on the criticisms rather than addressing the serious messages the campaign is trying to convey.”
Among discussions of how to handle the issue, one damage-limitation proposal was to expand messaging to cover all fast food sites.
One staffer said that “I think we should call it chicken shops where we can, because we announced it as chicken shops, and if we switch to calling it fast food outlets it looks like we are shying away and we believe there is some truth in what people are saying.”
Another solution suggested was asking if Vice News would tweet in support of the Home Office’s policy, since covered a previous version of the #KnifeFree project.
Staff from Home Secretary Priti Patel’s office complained about being side swiped by the campaign.
“Just to flag, the HS (Home Secretary) is concerned about the chicken box campaign. I think the main issue is she didn’t feel properly signed on what was planned”. Another email complained that that chicken box stuff wasn’t flagged to her team as “a national push”.
The debacle raised sufficient concerns that press office staff appeared to check whether there were any chicken shops along the route in Peckham Ms Patel would be taking on a patrol with the Met Police later that week, to avoid a ‘gotcha’ photograph opportunity.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “The #knifefree campaign was one element of a previous strategy to steer young people away from serious violence. Activity in fast food outlets was supported by evidence that gangs offer fast food to children to lure them into dealing drugs.”
This took the Home Office a year and an ICO complaint to release, as part of ongoing issues with timely transparency, worsened by the pandemic.
With thanks to @imosebba for help with the thread!

More from News

You want to know about Barockschloss Ludwigsburg? Too bad, I'm going to tell you some stuff about it, as it's my 'local'...


It all came about because Eberhard Ludwig, Duke of Württe.berg, decided in 1704 that he wanted a big old palace from which to be an absolutist Duke, and do absolutist things. So, picking an old hunting lodge, he started to extend it...


Thing is, though, to build a residential palace, you need a workforce. To gain a workforce, they needed somewhere to live. So, alongside the palace, he founded the town of Ludwigsburg, now adjacent to Stuttgart.


Ludwig resided at Ludwigsburg until 1733, when, childless, he kicked the bucket. Then Carl-Eugen, a relative, became Duke, and that's when things became lit.


See Carl Eugen had been raised in the court of Frederick the Great, and had been deprived of fun and female company - they were banned from the Prussian court.

So, he was essentially a big fat party animal from the get-go.

You May Also Like

The first ever world map was sketched thousands of years ago by Indian saint
“Ramanujacharya” who simply translated the following verse from Mahabharat and gave the world its real face

In Mahabharat,it is described how 'Maharishi Ved Vyasa' gave away his divine vision to Sanjay


Dhritarashtra's charioteer so that he could describe him the events of the upcoming war.

But, even before questions of war could begin, Dhritarashtra asked him to describe how the world looks like from space.

This is how he described the face of the world:

सुदर्शनं प्रवक्ष्यामि द्वीपं तु कुरुनन्दन। परिमण्डलो महाराज द्वीपोऽसौ चक्रसंस्थितः॥
यथा हि पुरुषः पश्येदादर्शे मुखमात्मनः। एवं सुदर्शनद्वीपो दृश्यते चन्द्रमण्डले॥ द्विरंशे पिप्पलस्तत्र द्विरंशे च शशो महान्।

—वेद व्यास, भीष्म पर्व, महाभारत


Meaning:-

हे कुरुनन्दन ! सुदर्शन नामक यह द्वीप चक्र की भाँति गोलाकार स्थित है, जैसे पुरुष दर्पण में अपना मुख देखता है, उसी प्रकार यह द्वीप चन्द्रमण्डल में दिखायी देता है। इसके दो अंशो मे पीपल और दो अंशो मे विशाल शश (खरगोश) दिखायी देता है।


Meaning: "Just like a man sees his face in the mirror, so does the Earth appears in the Universe. In the first part you see leaves of the Peepal Tree, and in the next part you see a Rabbit."

Based on this shloka, Saint Ramanujacharya sketched out the map, but the world laughed