Flag breakout in #Naukri
RSI & MACD displaying momentum
sustaining above 6760 it may rally towards 7380
#Nifty #stocks #stockmarkets #StockToWatch
Not trading call, academic post
More from Techno Prince
More from Naukri
Deepak Nitrite -
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) September 9, 2021
Doji Candles - Textbook - Indecision/Confusion amongst bulls and bears.
Practically - no bulls and bears - only smart money and retail investors
Few back to back doji - price being kept in a tight range to accumulate/distribute before an upcoming news pic.twitter.com/GckekXtgDu
Broken past the stiff resistance of 5640.
Sustenance above the same would bring in 5800 followed by 6000.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/Pex4mVNKS5
#NAUKRI
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 18, 2021
Slow and gradual turn from down to sideways to up.
Might be offing for a breakout above 5640 towards 5800 followed by 6000. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/3rAUGA7V99
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?