#MothersonSumi Breakout, retest and ready to Break out again 👌 https://t.co/QtgR3G9lSA
Yes,#Mothersonsumi #TataMotors #MindaIndustries my top picks in Autos @Twinkleinvest
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 18, 2021
More from Dare2Dream
Good morning & thank you everyone for ur wishes & blessings\U0001f64f
— Nirav S. Karia (@caniravkaria) June 19, 2021
Feeling better now as took Dolo 650 but my hand is paining a lot. (huge consumption of Dolo 650 which is manufactured by Micro Labs Ltd unlisted\U0001f600).
But one mentioned in image is really worth studying \U0001f4da\U0001f4d6 ahead \U0001f64f https://t.co/yyrkNyRGAx pic.twitter.com/MijZmCXPMQ
More from Motherson
#MothersonSumi Breaking out@caniravkaria pic.twitter.com/lpcR1J8r7H
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 12, 2021
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".