#MaithanAlloy
@nishkumar1977 Sir it's just a Starting, if we see from Chopper View it has a long way to go.
If we consider Rounding Bottom depth for Target then upside Target comes around 3500₹.
But remember it's a monthly chart it may take few years
More from Maithanalloys
Maithan Alloys - Trend change above 700 done
Retest of support at 700-710 is a great opportunity cmp 761+
Potential target 1000-1300-1500 in next 1-1.5 year
It has Pole & Flag pattern on multiyear log scale which gives a taget of 2000+ and more over next 3-4 years https://t.co/aCDDcGVqOc
Retest of support at 700-710 is a great opportunity cmp 761+
Potential target 1000-1300-1500 in next 1-1.5 year
It has Pole & Flag pattern on multiyear log scale which gives a taget of 2000+ and more over next 3-4 years https://t.co/aCDDcGVqOc
Yes please @shivaji_1983 sir. Share your chart view on MAITHAN ALLOYS
— Anushka (@AnushkaDas28) June 1, 2021
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
