You’re tired. You’re stressed. You’ve got anxiety. You aren’t seeing progress. You are fat. You are weak. You don’t sleep. You’re skin sucks.
It doesn’t have to be this way. ⬇️
HOW TO STOP EATING LIKE A CHILD
[Thread]
⬇️⬇️⬇️
You’re tired. You’re stressed. You’ve got anxiety. You aren’t seeing progress. You are fat. You are weak. You don’t sleep. You’re skin sucks.
It doesn’t have to be this way. ⬇️
Everything you consume revolves around pleasure.
Just like a child, you enjoy the high of that sugary snack.
And just like a child, you crash and become irritated and tired soon after. ⬇️
Big Food, Big Sugar, and hoards of companies shove advertisements for these addicting foods down your throat.
Children see an average of 3-5 fast food TV ads per day.
Add in billboards etc, and this is an abundance problem. ⬇️
We aren’t.
So you stuff your face with these things at every opportunity.
This fattens, softens, and depresses You.
So you eat even more to comfort yourself. ⬇️
Step 1:
Get a notebook and pen.
Don’t do anything different.
Eat as you normally would.
**Write down every last thing you put in your mouth for 2 WEEKS**
Don’t lie to yourself. ⬇️
If your list looks like this:
Fruit loops, Cookies, ice cream, Chips, French fries, burgers, pizza, Mountain Dew, Busch Lite, Gatorade, TV dinners etc
We’ve got work to do. ⬇️
You are going to drink a total of 1 gallon of water a day.
That’s 128 ounces.
If you insist that is too much, shut the fuck up and do it anyway.
It’s nothing. Have some discipline. ⬇️
If all you’ve been drinking is sugary coffee, soda, Gatorade, you are probably chronically dehydrated.
Don’t believe me?
Get a glass. Put some ice in it. Fill it with water.
Drink that whole glass
Soak it in
You’ll feel alive
Like a new person. ⬇️
Stop that bullshit immediately. Those calories are killing you.
Switch to diet. Or zero cal.
Then wean yourself off that
Make it an occasional treat. ⬇️
Step 3: we are going to add in some protein to your diet.
Protein is the most critical element.
Protein = meat.
Every meal, add extra protein.
Few more bites of steak. ⬇️
You are now logging your food, drinking a gallon of water, and eating extra protein.
You are now doing better than 95% of people!
Give yourself a pat on the back. ⬇️
We’ve been setting the foundation.
Step 3:
Time to worry about your calories
So far, you’ve just written what you eat
Now we are going to start paying attention to the amount of calories you are consuming ⬇️
Record everything in there that you eat.
It will give you the amount of calories you eat.
Do this for 2 weeks while continuing everything else.
If this is too hard for you, revert back to the gallon of water and build some fucking discipline. ⬇️
Here’s the formula:
Maintenance Calories = goal body weight in lbs x (10)+total weekly training hours.
Find this number.
Trying to lose weight? Eat 500 cals less for two weeks get on the scale. ⬇️
Hit that mark everyday and don’t go over.
LOG EVERTHING THAT GOES IN YOUR MOUTH.
Your weight will start to go down. ⬇️
Your food tracker will tell you how many grams you are eating per day.
If you aren’t already day, eat your body weight in grams of protein per day.
Non-negotiable. Do it. If you can’t, you don’t want it bad enough. ⬇️
Now is the time.
Go to your fridge and pantry.
Throw all your vegetable oils. All your processed food. All of your sugary treats.
Throw it all away. Start fresh. ⬇️
Eggs
Bacon
Red meats
Pork
Chicken
Rice
Potatoes
Fruits you like
Veggies you like
Real butter
Olive oil
Coconut oil
Whatever
Fill your fridge.
You are adult.
It is now your responsibility to have these on hand 24/7. ⬇️
Pre-make these meals.
Eat them.
No excuses.
No eating out. No extra office cookies. No treats.
Eat the food you intended on eating.
Everything else is noise. ⬇️
Kids eat treats because they succumb to the temptation and love the sweetness.
You have built the self control to enjoy them occasionally. ⬇️
More from Life
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BHAGWAT PURAN
It was Ved Vyas who edited the eighteen thousand shlokas of Bhagwat. This book destroys all your sins. It has twelve parts which are like kalpvraksh.
In the first skandh, the importance of Vedvyas
and characters of Pandavas are described by the dialogues between Suutji and Shaunakji. Then there is the story of Parikshit.
Next there is a Brahm Narad dialogue describing the avtaar of Bhagwan. Then the characteristics of Puraan are mentioned.
It also discusses the evolution of universe.( https://t.co/2aK1AZSC79 )
Next is the portrayal of Vidur and his dialogue with Maitreyji. Then there is a mention of Creation of universe by Brahma and the preachings of Sankhya by Kapil Muni.
In the next section we find the portrayal of Sati, Dhruv, Pruthu, and the story of ancient King, Bahirshi.
In the next section we find the character of King Priyavrat and his sons, different types of loks in this universe, and description of Narak. ( https://t.co/gmDTkLktKS )
In the sixth part we find the portrayal of Ajaamil ( https://t.co/LdVSSNspa2 ), Daksh and the birth of Marudgans( https://t.co/tecNidVckj )
In the seventh section we find the story of Prahlad and the description of Varnashram dharma. This section is based on karma vaasna.
It was Ved Vyas who edited the eighteen thousand shlokas of Bhagwat. This book destroys all your sins. It has twelve parts which are like kalpvraksh.
In the first skandh, the importance of Vedvyas
and characters of Pandavas are described by the dialogues between Suutji and Shaunakji. Then there is the story of Parikshit.
Next there is a Brahm Narad dialogue describing the avtaar of Bhagwan. Then the characteristics of Puraan are mentioned.
It also discusses the evolution of universe.( https://t.co/2aK1AZSC79 )
Next is the portrayal of Vidur and his dialogue with Maitreyji. Then there is a mention of Creation of universe by Brahma and the preachings of Sankhya by Kapil Muni.
HOW LIFE EVOLVED IN THIS UNIVERSE AS PER OUR SCRIPTURES.
— Anshul Pandey (@Anshulspiritual) August 29, 2020
Well maximum of Living being are the Vansaj of Rishi Kashyap. I have tried to give stories from different-different Puran. So lets start.... pic.twitter.com/MrrTS4xORk
In the next section we find the portrayal of Sati, Dhruv, Pruthu, and the story of ancient King, Bahirshi.
In the next section we find the character of King Priyavrat and his sons, different types of loks in this universe, and description of Narak. ( https://t.co/gmDTkLktKS )
Thread on NARK(HELL) / \u0928\u0930\u094d\u0915
— Anshul Pandey (@Anshulspiritual) August 11, 2020
Well today i will take you to a journey where nobody wants to go i.e Nark. Hence beware of doing Adharma/Evil things. There are various mentions in Puranas about Nark, But my Thread is only as per Bhagwat puran(SS attached in below Thread)
1/8 pic.twitter.com/raHYWtB53Q
In the sixth part we find the portrayal of Ajaamil ( https://t.co/LdVSSNspa2 ), Daksh and the birth of Marudgans( https://t.co/tecNidVckj )
In the seventh section we find the story of Prahlad and the description of Varnashram dharma. This section is based on karma vaasna.
#THREAD
— Anshul Pandey (@Anshulspiritual) August 12, 2020
WHY PARENTS CHOOSE RELIGIOUS OR PARAMATMA'S NAMES FOR THEIR CHILDREN AND WHICH ARE THE EASIEST WAY TO WASH AWAY YOUR SINS.
Yesterday I had described the types of Naraka's and the Sin or Adharma for a person to be there.
1/8 pic.twitter.com/XjPB2hfnUC
