The definition I'll go with is that it's the actions people take to advance the things they care about in the workplace.
Do you struggle with "office politics," like when Colleague got a promotion because they seem to have the same hobbies as the boss?
Do you have no idea how to play the game?
Do you recoil at the very word?
Then this thread is for you 👇
The definition I'll go with is that it's the actions people take to advance the things they care about in the workplace.
1) The company hitting its goals
2) The success of one's projects and initiatives
3) A promotion
4) A plum assignment or leadership role
4) A change in workplace culture, values or process
5) The advancement of a colleague / group of people
6) Personal reputation
Office politics has a negative connotation but is simply another manifestation of humans being complicated and having multiple, sometimes conflicting desires.
1) there is clear hierarchy + power dynamic (ceos, managers, etc)
2) how we perform at work impacts our self-esteem, identity, and ability to sustain ourselves
3) we spend 1/3+ of our waking hours in our workplace
For example, both of us are angling for one leadership role, or there's a fixed budget and I'm hoping my project gets more, which means yours gets less.
Someone (usually a sr manager) has to make a call.
1) I'm disappointed but accepting of the decision
2) I'm upset bc the decision-maker was unqualified
3) I'm irate bc the criteria was wrong/unfair
1) Ensure that you know how your manager + their managers define success. Ask in 1:1s if this is not clear.
2) Make sure your manager understands how *you* define success.
3) ...
4) Continually hone your communication skills. It is a key advantage.
5) ...
6) Ask yourself: did the decision-maker intend to do what they thought was best for the org?
7) If 6 is yes, ask yourself: do I trust the decision-maker's abilities and their values?
Otherwise, make sure your perspective has been heard, and trust in the process. Don't take the decision personally. Disagreement isn't a bad thing; we all learn from it.
1) Walk the walk + talk the talk in putting the company's goals above your personal goals
2) Create transparency around the process ahead of a decision. Eg what is the criteria for promotion?
3)..
More from Life
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.