š§µThis THREAD adds context to the @BuzzFeedNews article: These Black Capitol Police Officers Describe Fighting Off "Racist Ass Terrorists"
There was an organized militia within the rioters. They must be arrested and charged with treason.
https://t.co/eheu8qH1W7
NEW FOOTAGE: a long, disciplined line of men in body armor moves as a unit up the #CapitolBuilding steps.
— John Scott-Railton (@jsrailton) January 10, 2021
We need to identify this group.
Grateful to @lehudgins for the find.
Source: https://t.co/1CQlT5Sqa7 pic.twitter.com/Omdva2SiUS
āThe fundamental question will be, āIs being present at the rally in and of itself a violation of department policy?āā he said. āIt depends on what they did and what their role was in those events.ā
https://t.co/pcLLJIgbgI
More from Cleavon MD
@DrMarkSchuster
"When facilitators were asked to incorporate topics on bias & racial health disparities into the August 28, 2020 class, I decided to show up fully as a Black woman & physician. That morning, I paired a t-shirt with the words āI canāt breatheā with my usual African print attire"
For six weeks, Dr. @ayshakhoury was removed from both the clinic and the classroom. She remains suspended from her teaching role at the medical school. 3/10
"How is it possible in the same summer that racism is repeatedly confirmed as a public health issue, I was placed on a now 18 week suspension after facilitating a medical school class incorporating topics of bias & racial health disparities?" @ayshakhoury
https://t.co/hO3RNmgH4v
Doctor at Kaiser Medical School Claims She Was Suspended for Talking Race
These are some of the hashtags being used to identify rioters. #SeditionHunters
#StripesGuy
#StripesGuy assaulted Officer Daniel Hodges. Hodges says, he was \u201cpractically foaming at the mouth.\u201d He ripped his mask off, took his baton, beat officer Hodges with it and bloodied his face. @DCPoliceDept @FBIWFO #SeditionVids https://t.co/fZMBpwlyzs pic.twitter.com/cCJbaJTvE9
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
#ThePinMan
#ThePinMan assaulted and used a clear police shield to pin @DCPoliceDept Officer Daniel Hodges in a door jam. If you know this person call the FBI\u2019s Tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) @FBIWFO #SeditionVids pic.twitter.com/1vOyG3LWWx
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
#EyeGouger
#EyeGouger is wanted for assaulting a police officer and trying to gouge out his eye. If you know this person call the FBI\u2019s Tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) @DCPoliceDept @FBIWFO #SeditionVids pic.twitter.com/cwnADdlaqn
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
More from Legal
Let me explain what is wrong with that analogy . . . . .
To clarify -- my disagreement is not with those who are pointing out that law enforcement didn't respond with the same level of force and arrests at the capitol as it did during BLM protests.
That comparison deserves to be drawn and it raises some very important questions.
My disagreement is with those who are saying that what happened at the Capitol yesterday is so similar to what happened during protests this summer, that people's reactions ought to be similar--a suggestion that those reacting more strongly now are hypocritical.
Here's one example of someone (a law professor) making the argument. But I've seen it plastered across the site all day, it keeps cropping up in my mentions, and so I want to respond.
Very different reaction then. But kudos to those who\u2019ve consistently condemned riots. I hope, if nothing else, today\u2019s violence means we are all on the same page now. https://t.co/JhWadB80So
— Andy Grewal (@AndyGrewal) January 7, 2021
There are a number of things that distinguish what happened at the Capitol from what happened during BLM protests. The most obvious is the reason that people protested---some protested about factually false claims about election fraud; others about real police shootings.
2/ The case has flown mostly under the radar, likely because it was dismissed on the relatively unsexy issue of personal jurisdiction. But it's extremely important in cases about online speech (I'll add more to this thread later about that).
3/ The suit was brought by parents of Covington Catholic students that attended that infamous 'March for Life', who probably saw the Sandmann lawsuit and said "let's try to get rich off of this too!" There's no shortage of lawyers willing to help you on that quest.
4/ The basis of the lawsuit is that during the whirlwind of coverage over the March for Life incident, Kathy Griffin sent some tweets about identifying the protesters seen in the videos that went viral.
Complaint: https://t.co/EF9ST2Som5
5/ The lawsuit calls these tweets "doxing," which strikes me as kind of hyperbolic. I know some people disagree with me on this, but the identity of someone taking part in a public event (which is literally all Griffin asked for) is not particularly private information.