But you see you don't actually understand how lawmaking works there's this set of procedures and dates that BLEAAAARGHHHHHvomitvomit

Neoliberalism is an economic genocidal ideology predicated on maintaining capitalism, and capitalism is the impoverishment, oppression and death of poor people because that's the OBJECTIVE of capitalist ideology. It's a malthusian ideology.

Neoliberals are the original Alt-Right
Capitalism has ZERO todo with "markets vs. no markets," or "central planning vs. decentralization." That's *propaganda*. That's a diversion.

Capitalism is the NAME OF THE ABSENCE of any support for poor people. In capitalism, giving ANY power to poor people is a CRIME.
Capitalism has an *exception* to the strict forbiddance of giving any economic power to the 99%, and that is the concept of "Merit."

If you act as a SLAVE (wage slave), then you can get some crumbs to *temporarily* avoid your death. While you are mechanically useful.
These fucking Neoliberals which are 99% of the Democratic Party in the US are all POSING as nice people. They are not. They are all sociopaths.

This economic fascism is so thoroughly normalized in the US that nobody has a concept of what capitalism is.
The fact that capitalists -- the owners of the undemocratic workplaces -- are all rich on the backs of their workers is also a *diversion*.
If a capitalist owner suddenly decides to run a virtual co-op where he earns all his personal profits but gives it all away in bonuses to all the workers, and if he actually listens for what workers want, implementing a de-facto democracy, he will be *targeted and destroyed*.
This happened in Brazil mid last century. The decent industrialists were all persecuted and dispossessed.

"Communism" / "Socialism" is an accusation used against anybody that is NOT onboard the classist Malthusian genocide program.
Capitalism AS AN IDEOLOGY, as a belief system, as "neoclassical economics," as neo-liberalism, must be exposed for the fascist right-wing genocidal malthusian market-based religious ideology that it is.
The "Market God" of capitalism is NOT an exaggeration. The robes of this ideology that the high priests use are the suit and tie, the corporate attire, the BMW.

Why do you think people were giving Andrew Yang a hard time for missing a fucking tie? Because it's a literal church.
Yang was saying, signaling:

I'm not part of this bullshit fundamentalist malthusian "Market" church that has taken over the secular institutions by *disguising itself* as a secular belief. I'm just a human being.
Yang is an anti-malthusian person; he is not a capitalist by definition, because capitalism requires poverty. Someone who wants to abolish poverty is not a capitalist.

That's not how the word "capitalism" is used. Because people are idiots. But you are not. Now you know.
Capitalism is a dirty, dirty word. Do not attempt to use it in a positive sense. Do not attempt to use it to denote anything positive, unless you know what you're doing.

More from Fabiana Cecin 🏴 🌹

More from Law

One of the judges this story mentions is William Cassidy, who was promoted from an Atlanta IJ position to a BIA member position in 2019 by the Trump DOJ. Cassidy has an awful history that has been well-documented, but I'm still enraged reading this reporting.


The story notes that the EOIR Director served as an ICE attorney in Atlanta and practiced before Cassidy for years. And it points to FOIA records unearthed by Bryan Johnson showing they remain friendly.

A trove of complaints against Cassidy was published by AILA in 2019 after FOIA litigation. They generally show misconduct, substantiated in the record, followed by "written counseling" etc.

One way Cassidy could avoid discipline is by turning off the recording device during the hearing. If he made a lewd or offensive comment off the record, all the EOIR would do is listen to the recording. If it's not there, the complaint is "unsubstantiated" https://t.co/wUeBPEEbpV


In that case, Cassidy joked about a detained immigrant saying he missed his wife. The complaint was dismissed because the ACIJ found "no levity or joking" in the comment.

You May Also Like