BC TRADING
Saved by @Alex1Powell

OK let me try math again.

GoodStaking: you invest X, like you would in a savings account. After many years it produces Y interest, of which Y/2 go to the reserve over time, and Y/2 becomes G$ that you own.

 No, that's wrong. Jesus.

The entire Y goes into the reserve, and that generates a Z amount of G$.

Z/2 goes to people as UBI.

Z/2 goes to you.
OK, so I wasn't that far off.

If I donate a large amount of money to the reserve, what I am doing is emulating a large Y. I'm taking a ton of money that I *have* (so it would be a "principal" today, a X) and pretending it's like a Y of someone else that will do GoodStaking.
The money that I have is a small X. It will generate a small Y. Instead, I want to take my small X and pretend it's a large Y, which would originate from a large X. That I don't have. Because I'm poor.
So if I want to make the largest possible impact into the UBI reserve, to make a splash, and help it be noticed, I can take the small amount of money I have, the X I have, and pretend it's a Y of staking, and time warp it to the present and use the X to buy G$ from the reserve.
What GoodStaking does is a purchase of G$ over time from the interest of your e.g. USD investment which donates *half* *the G$* from that purchase. What is donated is both an amount of G$, and the risk associated with the difference between the G$ and the e.g. USD currencies.
When you buy from the reserve, you get ALL of the G$, so the only thing you are truly donating is the difference of risk between holding G$ and e.g. USD. When you buy G$ from the reserve directly you donate risk, but not "50% of your interest" (i.e. your purchase with some money)
When you invest in GoodStaking, you are risking very little. In fact, you're doing what rich people do, which is invest, which is what causes financial independence, which is a way to get out of e.g. being a wage slave. By investing, you're doing the right financial thing.
GoodStaking IS an investment. Meaning you're earning money from money, directly. You earn that interest money as G$, which is money, albeit money that has a different risk profile than the e.g. USD.
As you're risking very little, and you can move your invested principal to something else at any time, then it makes sense that you also donate half of your interest, in G$, to the UBI claimers. So you're directly funding the world's UBI by keeping your money in GoodStaking.
It's really really clever.

You're buying into the G$ economy with your interest. That means that you're basically taking the mechanism of interest and making it ** ethical. **

The interest you earn is economically meaningless if it does not help everyone else!
The interest you earn is in G$. If G$ succeeds and it lifts people out of poverty, your interest succeeds. If G$ does not succeed and does not lift people out of poverty, then your interest is nothing. It couples finance with social good!
The thing where 50% of the G$ you earn with the interest goes for the UBI is just a way for people to go, yes, sure, also take half of my interest and distribute as UBI, why not.

Not only you're taking your 5% / year interest and making it ethical, you're reducing it to 2.5% ...
... and distributing the other 2.5% as a direct UBI, direct redistribution, which is made in the *form* of the G$ currency, but whose dollar value is indeed the "dollar" value of the time the G$ currency was acquired and thus is an UBI donation in dollar value.
The current GoodDollar system has a *dollar* daily income due to the amount in the GoodStaking that it already has. The UBI dollar value is insignificant because the number of claimers of the G$ *currency* is an actual *hit*, which dilutes that dollar value into nothingness.
Because the system literally just started, like, 3 months ago.
If there was 1 claimer they would be earning like $1,000 a day or something like that.
Or $100, I'm not sure what's the staking income in dollar value right now.
If I ever invest in life, it will be in GoodStaking.
Done with the bank shit. If doesn't produce G$ as interest -- a democratic currency -- then it is invalid.
Now, why doesn't the GoodReserve sell only 50% of the purchased amount in G$, and allocate the other 50% to the UBI? It could have been built to do that. Then it would be the same as the GoodStaking, would it not, all things being equal?
Let's say you have some other "defi" (financial investment) elsewhere. I invest X. I get Y in "dollar" interest. Then I manually send that Y into the GoodReserve, and get Z G$.

If the reserve sent me back just Z/2 G$ instead of G$, it would be the exact same as the GoodStaking.
In fact, the GoodStaking could be the same as the GoodReserve. You get Z G$. You get the entire interest of the defi as G$, and you contribute only risk.

Then, you could complement that with a way for people to volunteer G$ into the UBI pool.
Why not do that? The reason is that it makes the system worse. Because we should all want to fund the UBI. We want to give G$ to everyone. I think 50% of the G$ interest income going directly to the UBI is exactly how it should work. If I invested that's what I'd want.
Why would I want that? Because it makes my contribution more contributey. More UBI is more good and it's doing it automatically while I sleep. That's exactly what everyone wants.
Now if the GoodReserve purchase kept 50% of the G$ in the cDAI (i.e. USD) to G$ conversion, that would be weird.

The GoodReserve is a low-level mechanism. The GoodStaking is a high-level mechanism built on top of the GoodReserve.
The GoodReserve is a way for people to donate risk. GoodStaking limits how much risk you can donate at once, because interest from a principal is a tiny number so you contribute a tiny amount compared to your principal in the present. Like, right now.
And let's be clear. The GoodDollar system is something that defeats the whole financial trap. It is mathematically designed for success. The more people purchase risk from the reserve directly or indirectly, the less risk everyone has. The risk goes to zero over time.
The risk goes to zero because a democratic monetary system reduces conflict in the world, which is the main cause of actual real objective risk in the world.

UBI is financial security for all because it is security of every kind. It's a real economy defeating the poverty economy
All purchases into the GoodDollar system strengthen the system. You cannot damage the system by buying into it. It's impossible.

It does not matter how you contribute. All interactions reinforce the system.
GoodDollar is a Hyperobject
Actually, the less you think about it and just believe and jump in, in any capacity, the better
All we need is UX/UI for participation. No way people are dealing with this ethereum wallet shit. No fucking way
No amount of storytelling is going to make normal people torture themselves with crypto

Money is custodial. People don't manage "safe combination security" for gold bars at home. That's nuts
Crypto UX is an absolute non starter
GoodDollar is for normal people.
Coinbase is already a stretch for people
This is for the stakers and traders. The claimer end is solved.
The trader / investor / philanthropist end is the end that I want to focus on because the GD wallet is already superb.
The GoodReserve is a way to get traders interested. The GoodStaking is a way to get investors interested. The wallet is a way to get currency users and recipients interested.

Since all energy contributes because it's a hyperobject, just pick one to develop.
It is impossible to harm the project by trading it
That is why getting rich people on board would be easier: because there's very few of them, and that's like a handful of high value Ethereum transactions that we can just manually assist. Instead of having to explain Ethereum to a million people.
The success signal of a billion dollars committed to the GoodReserve would be unequivocally good for this project.
We could do a giant kickstarter for the GoodReserve. The kickstarter operators collect in fiat, and then convert into a GoodReserve donation, and the G$ is either destroyed or entirely distributed as UBI.
You could also do a giant kickstarter for a giant GoodStaking-committed pile, if that pile could be controlled by the GoodDAO. I.e. the GoodDAO would control "public stakes", public investments.
The difference is that this giant Good-Stake would contribute to the reserve slowly instead of instantly, and that people would not be able to sell G$ to collect this principal.

How important is that? I'm not sure.
If I had two billion dollars, I'd commit one to a giant GoodStaking stake, and one to the GoodReserve, just to see what happens.

It's both. It doesn't matter which one and in which order.
We need lots of use, lots of staking, and lots of reserve.

More of anything is better in any order. This has to be clear. This has to be the story.
This has to be crystal clear.
A dynamic system is experimented with. It is studied. We will learn things, and in the process of learning, only good things will happen, and no bad things will happen.

The GoodDollar system has no bad states.

Everything is "Good for GoodDollar." That's how you win.
We need energy to go into the system. Any energy you have available to put into the system is valid.

Getting people to install and use the wallet and value G$ into economic interactions is one way.
If we do just that -- just install wallet and use -- the system will succeed. If a billion people are "playing" with G$, then it instantly is no longer play. In fact, that's cheating. That's going straight to the solution, which is mass cultural acceptance. It's the end goal.
The reserve/staking stuff is the hard part because it involves the accumulation of capital, which is a social game that is designed to be difficult, competitive. Which is the thing that we are trying to get rid of with the building of a global democratic economy.
So, ironically, the solved part, which is the wallet UX, if we do just that, we cheat and solve the whole thing. That alone will cause people to invest in the G$ reserves and to buy G$ with investment interest.
On the other hand, reserve and staking activism also help the stories of adoption of the wallet. So why not invest in a mechanism that helps? If you have several intervention points, why not farm all of them to the optimal point?
*optimal level
(as in the "diminishing returns" thing)
Also, reserve and staking activism is very hard to decode and explain, which is why it's interesting. Explaining the GoodDollar wallet and use of the G$ currency as a currency is boring because it's perfect and obvious.
Lots of people are going to do that. I don't need to do that.
The GoodReserve, for example, exists and can be used. If it was not meant to be used then it would not exist. If increased reserves and the swapping of USD by G$ at will was a bad thing, then it would not be allowed. Which means it must be a good thing.
And if you cannot see the ability to buy 20 million G$ with a few thousand bucks as insane fun, then I just have to question your sanity. It's as simple as that. It's just mad fun.
Buying millions of G$ from the reserve is just insane fun. Now I can imagine that I have "millions" to distribute to people. It's just a charity power trip. Maybe it's crazy, but it is helping the system by definition, and it makes me happy for that.
It is not possible for me to accidentally damage this system. All my interactions *with the system* are ethical and good by design. I can only be unethical (or dumb) if I tell you that you're going to get rich with this system. Which is something that's not possible to know.

More from Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน

Fabiana Cecin \U0001f3f4 \U0001f339
Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน...
@fabianacecin
The US peoples could create an organization that issues a RENT token that is nominally worth 1 USD each of debt as a kind of bond to every homeowner so there is no excuse and you will not be making other people homeless.

The government can do this kind of thing very easily and in fact, every government is doing this, but if your government won't and you have the tech and the social climate to pull this off without being assassinated then you should do it because it would work.

Social debt can be redeemed by anyone, anytime. The origination mechanism of a token tells the story of whether it will be redeemed by society in an entirely volunteer fashion.

If a RENT token exists, you know that it was created by people to avoid other people being evicted. Then you can choose to honor it if (i) you can (iia) you think rent is legitimate or (iib) you think it's strategic to help pretend rent is legitimate (iii) you believe the issuer

Democratic, bottom-up currency creation is a technology that we must hand to people. It must be trivial to create tokens, and we must learn the power of volunteering *towards currencies*. This is an entire social language that's going to emerge.
SOCIETY
Fabiana Cecin \U0001f3f4 \U0001f339
Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน...
@fabianacecin
Before I try to solve the GoodReserve vs. GoodStaking problem, which involves math and time and interest, let me solve something easier, which is all of modern politics.

Here's an example. When the pandemic was in the first wave here in Brazil, you could see lots of cultural noise about the fact that rich people were not dying because they got hospital care, whereas poor maids etc. were getting infected by rich people e.g. coming back from Italy.

Then, after a while, this story died. We "know" this now, but nothing happened.

When this sort of thing happens -- lots of noise, followed by normalization -- we are trained to think that that's *OUR* fault as cultural noisemakers.

IF ONLY WE MADE MORE NOISE, we think.

Why do we think that?

We think that because of all the times making noise worked.

Or did it? Did it actually work? Was it actually the noise that "changed" things?

Nope. The noise doesn't change anything.

EVER.

Here's how this works.
POLITICS
Advertisement
Fabiana Cecin \U0001f3f4 \U0001f339
Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน...
@fabianacecin
I'm having difficulty seeing the need for any other currency in the world other than G$.

If it works, and it is decentralized, then why would we need more than one global-reach currency?

If it does the job perfectly, then why do we need another?

I don't mean there won't be others. What I mean is that maybe Crypto UBI will be like the existing non-democratic crypto market ranking. There will be a first-place market cap amount, and exponential decay to the #2, #3, #4, etc.

This is in contrast to the simplistic view where we assume there will be X systems and they all have more or less the same abstract Y market cap or reach, and they all add up to an integrated system with X*Y market cap.

All you have to do is design the controls the way they want to be designed. If you don't introduce some unneeded damage in it, then there won't be the need to come up with another system that fixes the damage and actually does complete "the system" that we will use.

E.g. Bitcoin would have worked, except it introduced the damage that is Proof-of-Work, which means it is unusable and will be replaced by Ethereum, which will use PoS, thus fixing the damage.
TRADING
Fabiana Cecin \U0001f3f4 \U0001f339
Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน...
@fabianacecin
This is still the dark ages of software development. I don't mean that in the common nonsense sense of "methods," but of perception and of goals.

As a whole, this behaves exactly like a primitive age does: all effort spent solving the same problems over and over again.

A "technology," if it means anything, is something you do that stops you from solving the same problem over and over again. You can spend J energy solving every instance of problem X as it manifests into infinity, or you can spend J energy abolishing X through a "technology."

Capitalism rewards every industry, not only "tech," to never abolish a good X. Instead, it encourages us to create some machinery to sell temporary remedies for getting rid of every instance of X as it crops up everywhere.

If "technology is what matters," then we must change the social system and culture we live in, because that culture is the greatest meta-machine for mass suppression of technology that has ever been invented.

People's instincts, individually and collectively, are always to correctly decide when to erase instances of problem generators, and when to attack the problem generators themselves. The current system and culture eliminate 99%+ of that wisdom. It's massively stupid.
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Fabiana Cecin \U0001f3f4 \U0001f339
Fabiana Cecin ๐Ÿด ๐ŸŒน...
@fabianacecin
But you see you don't actually understand how lawmaking works there's this set of procedures and dates that BLEAAAARGHHHHHvomitvomit


Neoliberalism is an economic genocidal ideology predicated on maintaining capitalism, and capitalism is the impoverishment, oppression and death of poor people because that's the OBJECTIVE of capitalist ideology. It's a malthusian ideology.

Neoliberals are the original Alt-Right

Capitalism has ZERO todo with "markets vs. no markets," or "central planning vs. decentralization." That's *propaganda*. That's a diversion.

Capitalism is the NAME OF THE ABSENCE of any support for poor people. In capitalism, giving ANY power to poor people is a CRIME.

Capitalism has an *exception* to the strict forbiddance of giving any economic power to the 99%, and that is the concept of "Merit."

If you act as a SLAVE (wage slave), then you can get some crumbs to *temporarily* avoid your death. While you are mechanically useful.

These fucking Neoliberals which are 99% of the Democratic Party in the US are all POSING as nice people. They are not. They are all sociopaths.

This economic fascism is so thoroughly normalized in the US that nobody has a concept of what capitalism is.
LAW

More from Trading

Yogeeswar Pal
Yogeeswar Pal
@yogeeswarpal
A thread.

Earnings Trades Simplified.

Earnings announcements are public announcements that display a companyโ€™s earnings, or lack thereof. As the earnings announcement gets closer, implied volatility tends to increase. After earnings are announced,...

1/n

the uncertainty of what will happen diminishes, and usually we see a rapid decrease in implied volatility because of it. Because of this phenomena, we tend to stick to premium selling strategies when it comes to earnings plays. We can take advantage...

2/n

of the implied volatility crush by selling premium prior to the announcement, and buying it back after the announcement.

Earnings trades are not for everyone, as they involve high amounts of uncertainty and random movements.

3/n


Why Trade Earnings -

-Increase number of occurrences, many trades available so increases of our probability of profit.

-High IV opportunities

-Short term Binary event leading to drastic volatility crush.

4/n

Factors to consider when placing earnings trade -

1. Expected Move
2. When to place trade
3. Historical Moves
4. Strategies based on market conditions

5/n
TRADING , ALL
Trader knight
Trader knight
@Traderknight007
A thread on Risk and Returns


Trader X -

Net-worth - 5 Cr
Trading capital - 25 lakh

Trader Y -

Net-worth - 30 lakh
Trading capital - 25 lakh

Trader X take risk of 2% per trade and he makes about 30-40 % Return on trading capital per month,

Whereas Trader Y only risk 0.25% per trade and he makes about 3-4 % on Trading capital per month.

Trader Y saw how much trader X is making with the same amount of capital that he has.

He is frustrated with his mediocre results as compared to Trader X, though he donโ€™t know the fact that Trader X Is only trading with 5 % of his total net worth.

Trader X has much more risk taking ability in Rupee terms as compared to the Trader Y because he has higher net-worth.

Trader X will not have much impact when he goes into deep Drawdowns , 40-50% where as if the Trader Y goes below 15% DD , it will have deep psychological impact on him.

Even if the Trader X makes 100% return on his trading capital , turns 25 lakh into 50 lakhs ,
TRADING
Advertisement
Aditya Todmal
Aditya Todmal
@AdityaTodmal
TradingView isn't just charts

It's much more powerful than you think

9 things TradingView can do, you'll wish you knew yesterday: ๐Ÿงต

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

1/ Free Multi Timeframe Analysis

Step 1. Download Vivaldi Browser

Step 2. Login to trading view

Step 3. Open bank nifty chart in 4 separate windows

Step 4. Click on the first tab and shift + click by mouse on the last tab.

Step 5. Select "Tile all 4 tabs"


What happens is you get 4 charts joint on one screen.

Refer to the attached picture.

The best part about this is this is absolutely free to do.

Also, do note:

I do not have the paid version of trading view.


2/ Free Multiple Watchlists

Go through this informative thread where @sarosijghosh teaches you how to create multiple free watchlists in the free


3/ Free Segregation into different headers/sectors

You can create multiple sections sector-wise for free.

1. Long tap on any index/stock and click on "Add section above."
2. Secgregate the stocks/indices based on where they belong.

Kinda like how I did in the picture below.
SCREENERS , ALL , TRADINGVIEW
JayneshKasliwal
JayneshKasliwal
@JayneshKasliwal
๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜†-๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜†

Complete Backtest and Indicator link

๐Ÿงต A Thread ๐Ÿงต

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฝ:
๐Ÿ”ธ Monthly Option Buying
๐Ÿ”ธ 50 ema on 3 min timeframe
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend 10 , 3
๐Ÿ”ธ Chart : Banknifty , Nifty Futures as we backtested on futures
๐Ÿ”ธ Entry 9:20 to 3:00
๐Ÿ”ธ Max 3 Entries per day
๐Ÿ”ธ Premium nearest to 200 Rs only

[2/18]

Why Monthly Option buying ?
๐Ÿ”ธ Less theta decay compared to weekly options
๐Ÿ”ธ Less Volatility
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend and MA Settings
[3/18]


๐Ÿ”ธ Indicator Link
๐Ÿ”ธ Click on the below ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ -> ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด -> ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต from favourites and start using it !

๐Ÿ”ธ https://t.co/zVXavqLBto
[4/18]

๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ :
๐Ÿ”ธ Max 6 Trades per day ( Both CE and PE buy)
๐Ÿ”ธ Timings 9:20 am to 3:00 pm
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend : 10,3
๐Ÿ”ธ Moving Average 50 ema
[5/18]
ALL , TRADING , A OPTION BUYING INDICATOR
JayneshKasliwal
JayneshKasliwal
@JayneshKasliwal
How to Avoid Big Losses In trading ?

1. Avoid Stocks Below 200 ema
2. Sell Stocks in Stage 4 Down Trend
3. Dont Trade Stocks that are moving in Circuits
4. Avoid News based Trading

A thread With examples๐Ÿ”–

Retweet to Educate Your Trading Friends !
1/n

A Study Shows that 90% of the winning Stocks stay above 200 ema before a big Advancing Phase

1. Simply Not Holding or Buying Stocks below 200 ema Saves a lot of time and Money.
2. You can looses opportunity Cost if you buy stocks below 200 ema.
3. TimeFrame: Daily 200 ema

2/n


B. Sell Stocks in Stage 4 Down Trend

1. Stocks Exhibiting this are in complete Bear Grip
2. The 30 week ema acts as reference for stage analysis
3. These Stocks can be short sold on pullback to 30wema
4. Happens after Topping Phase
5. TimeFrame : Weekly , 30 Week Ema

3/n


C. Dont Trade Stocks that are moving in Circuits

1. Mostly these stocks are Speculatve and Operator Driven.
2. You never know what is the top of the trend and may get Stuck with Huge Losses

Example : TTML , Alok , Ruchi etc
This is Pyramid Structure and news driven also
4/n


D. Avoid News based Trading
1. Whenever a postive News comes in Market People Jump in Buying the Stocks without thinking .
2. Most of the the times the news is factored in or gets factored after heavy buying
3. Your Money may get Stuck

Example : PnbBousing , AdaniPower
5/n
TRADING

You May Also Like

Angad Singh
Angad Singh
@Singh7575
๐™Ž๐™๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ข๐™ฎ ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™จ๐™™๐™ค๐™ข ๐‘พ๐’๐’'๐’• ๐’ƒ๐’† ๐’”๐’–๐’“๐’‘๐’“๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐’… ๐’Š๐’‡ ๐’•๐’๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’“๐’๐’˜ ๐’– ๐’“๐’†๐’‚๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’”๐’•๐’–๐’‡๐’‡ ๐’Š๐’ 50๐’Œ ๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’”๐’‰๐’๐’‘ ๐’๐’“ ๐’”๐’๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’๐’† ๐’Ž๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’š๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’†๐’š ๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’‰ ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’„
Simple and effective way 2 make Money


Idea 1:- Use pivot level like 14800 in case of nifty and sell 14800straddle monthly expiry (365+335) exit if nifty closes on daily basis below S1 or above R1

After closing below S1 if it closes above S1 next day or any day enter the same position again vice versa for R1

Idea2:- Use R1 and S1 corresponding strikes multiple
Incase of R1 15337 take 15300ce
N in case of S1 14221 use 14200pe
Sell both and hold till expiry or exit if nifty closes below S1 or above R1 around closing
If the same bounces above S1 and falls below R1 re-enfer same strikes

Use same criteria for nifty, usdinr and banknifty

(This is must)Use this margin rule for 1lot banknifty pair keep 4Lax margin
For nifty one lot keep 3Lax
For usdinr 100lots keep 4Lax

I bet you if you do this on consistent basis your ROI will be more than 70% on yearly basis.

Couldn't explain easier than this

Criticisms are most welcomed.
OPTIONSLEARNINGS , MONTHLY OPTIONS SELLING , OPTIONS LEARNING
James Felton
James Felton
@JimMFelton
Butt plugs were originally sold as a miracle cure for headaches, acne, and insanity

Thread, article here and h/t: @qikipedia :
https://t.co/Ts84xnmWKJ


For a long time, medicine was pre-occupied with the question "can this be solved by putting something in the butt?"

Take, for example, tobacco smoke enemas, in which 18th Century physicians saw drowning victims and attempted to de-deadify them by blowing tobacco smoke up their rectums with a pipe.


Despite having no medical benefit whatsoever, the practice was popular, and enema kits lined the Thames like lifebelts, ready to be used as one final humiliation for somebody who was crap at swimming.

This practice ended sometime after 1800 when it became apparent that it didn't really work, given how the anus famously isn't really connected to the lungs, but doctors weren't quite finished with having a poke around in the old anus to see what happens just yet.
TECH
Advertisement
Andrey \uf8ff Azimov
Andrey ๏ฃฟ Azimov
@AndreyAzimov
The best way to know if people like your product is NOT:

- Have a lot of emails in the waiting list
- Become #1 on PH
- Become #1 of HN or Reddit
- Have people that saing "I'll pay"
- Have a lot of free users

The best way to know if they're actually pay for it.

The only thing that matters is your product providing a value, and you can't know this until people will pay money for it.

We can have a first signal of a product/market fit after the launch by check how many sales we've got in the first 24h. Some scale:

200+ This has a high potential.
100+: This has a potential.
50+: Some people need it.
10+: People almost don't need it.
0+: People don't need it.

This is for a single time payment product. For a subscription probably it should be less because people hate subscription.

And obviously, you should have a lot of traffic like 3-5k+.

Here is a stat for my products (macOS apps) for the first 24h after the launch:
STARTUPS
Anu Satheesh \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Anu Satheesh ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ...
@AnuSatheesh5
Bhoga Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Temple
#Devarayanadurga
#Karnatakatemples ๐Ÿšฉ

Bhoga Yoga Narasimha Swamy Temple, Devarayanadurga is located near Tumkur of Karnataka. There are two temples are here for Narasimha Swamy, one is at the base of the hill which is Bhoga Narasimhar and ๐Ÿ‘‡


the other on the top ofย  hill which is Yoga Narasimhar.

Bhoga Narasimha swamy Temple Prathista is said to be done by Maharshi Durvasa who did tapasya here. While doing tapasya Muni wished to bath in river Ganga and decided to travel to Ganga river bank,


At that time Ganga Devi appeared here and said she will remain here in the temple pond.

Yoga Narasimha swamy Prathista is believed to be done by Bhrama Deva who did tapasya here for many years.


Narasimhar appeared with Lakshmi Devi here to give darshan to Bhrama Deva here.

เค‰เค—เฅเคฐเค‚ เคตเฅ€เคฐเค‚ เคฎเคนเคพเคตเคฟเคทเฅเคฃเฅเค‚ เคœเฅเคตเคฒเคจเฅเคคเค‚ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเคคเฅ‹เคฎเฅเค–เคฎเฅเฅค
เคจเฅƒเคธเคฟเค‚เคนเค‚ เคญเฅ€เคทเคฃเค‚ เคญเคฆเฅเคฐเค‚ เคฎเฅƒเคคเฅเคฏเฅเคฎเฅƒเคคเฅเคฏเฅเค‚ เคจเคฎเคพเคฎเฅเคฏเคนเคฎเฅ เฅฅ

Om Shri Narasimha Murthaye Namah
๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ•‰๐Ÿ™
ALL
dan spaceman
dan spaceman
@ohlaika
ugh i wanted to do a thread about the wars in Star Wars and how the two outlying wars (the clone wars in the prequels and the cold war/civil war in the sequels) are really weird but i don't feel like it any more.

my first argument is that the Clone Wars were a really complex morally gray moment in Star Wars canon in like, 5 different directions and I'd kind of like to know why Lucas did that.

especially with the direct line that's drawn in the OT with the allegory of WW2 and Vietnam with the rebels being the Vietnamese and the Empire being America. That...doesn't exist in the Clone Wars.

for starters: it's weird it's called the Clone Wars. I get why, because that's what Kenobi calls it in STAR WARS, but the clones are a small facet in the larger story of the war.

the clones basically only exist as a macguffin in AOTC that is...extremely confusing ultimately. Because if you accept that Sidious has this grand master plan to use this war to destabilize the Republic and form an Empire...it's way too complex.
CULTURE


Category Partner: Enkryptopedia