#MotilalOswal reiterated Buy Call on #lauruslabs with Target price of 800 means 23% upside from CMP. It's not just a noise or hype on Laurus. It's true that we will see laurus in a better position in 3 years. It's in a transforming phase. Try to accumulate in dips.
More from Lauruslabs
Haters are gonna hate, but IMO, this is the best opportunity to start pyramiding and make it a well sized holding.
A trio of patterns coming together, has one of the highest success rate!
Double Top Buy, T20 Pattern - Bullish & Super pattern - Bullish above 477.81! https://t.co/SqzkTyb9wx
LAURUSLABS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) December 17, 2020
There was no entry in Oct as the stock didn't close above 340.
Don't chase & don't buy it for short term.
Now, DTB above 348.15 daily close (Now trading at similar levels).
Wait for close above it or check if it's above the trigger price after 15:20 and enter. https://t.co/vh5hZpjJER pic.twitter.com/EprcgeLSqb
Breakaway Gaps/Breakout Gaps.
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) October 2, 2021
Attached tweet of clerx for March 30th. See the chart to look for if the gap was filled or not? and, if price pulled back? https://t.co/AbjWWw1985 pic.twitter.com/zpHMcVaDJ7
✅✅ https://t.co/MtJOLfpzYj
Laurus Labs - I am waiting till 3:15 PM to get confirmation of closing above 700 to add more of it in my portfolio. \u2705\u2705 pic.twitter.com/UxZCuxhuIX
— Steve Nison (@nison_steve) August 9, 2021
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".