I also noted the images displayed on the temple wall where this persecution is claimed were wearing the sacred thread which is common to Brahmins. So ,they were most probably
@It_is_HitS @ANKURJAIN1811 @Charmi_Ankit @VedicWisdom1 @Sameeksha_India @YashodhanGandhi @Dikshit99_Bhatt @Dharma_Granth @truejainology @jaintrue @kshemsmita @arpitjain__ @jindeshna @JainPayal12 @jainheritage @ankitjain2191 @prithvi525 @Pureminority @1AakashJain @YoungJainsIndia @_Swagittarius @Mjmansijain @JainMaggii Let us take ur claims one by one -
U r talking about -
Impalement of the Jains in Madurai
It was a pious Shaivite triumphal fiction with zero confirmation from Jain sources. In other words the Jains have never claimed that they were persecuted or impaled. If u can show in any
I also noted the images displayed on the temple wall where this persecution is claimed were wearing the sacred thread which is common to Brahmins. So ,they were most probably
In Buddhism case ,The Buddhist texts do mention their persecution at hands of Hindus .
But than i pondered
If People left Hinduism when they adopted Buddhism but if that was so ,than it should have happened to every other place where Buddhism spread
Bonpo Religion in tibet,
Confuciaism,taoism in China ,
shintoism in japan,
Native Pagan traditions and
tengrism,Shamanism,Animism in South East Buddhist Nations
remained intact until recent takeover in last centuries.
So on what assumption can u
Furthermore I found several holes within Buddhist narrative .
Eg - Balaji idol is Buddha's and Vaishnavas converted it later iwth hindu symbols on it.
I investigated and found - Balaji has four arms - no statue of buddha has four arms.
i compared and contrasted the ground plan and structure with the canons of Buddhist temple building .
Buddhism is a non-theistic monastic religion in which temples are discredited - There are no such Buddhist texts which deal with the
Hindu Temples in India are all constructed exactly according to canons of architecture i.e. Vastu Shastra - Mayamata is one such textbook example. All the Agamas also contain plans for temple building.
the 3d views
The Jaganath Puri temple conforms to standard plans found all over India and even South East Asia.
Further more i noted -
There is no comparison as the philosophy behind the temple structure is different
The Hindu Agama temple represents the human body and the deity enshrined is a reflection (bimba) of the ātman. So each and every part of the temple has analogue to the human body and the body is symbolic of the Universe which is the “body” of Ishvara.
The Buddhist temple on the other hand has no such symbolism and is just a structure which houses an image of the Buddha or Bodhisattva for the purpose of veneration and celebration. A Buddhist temple is built like a Royal palace - Prasād where the
If any Buddhist can show to me-
Where did Buddha say to construct temples and idols and to worship them? Why do Buddhist worship his relics?
I will accept the claim
Furthermore Buddhistb Lies are carefully crafted- like there were 84000 stupas
Although Budhism was responsible for destruction of India ,This i realized
More from India
"At least we don't behead people, be happy"....
Thread on beheadings by H!ndus
(1/n) https://t.co/jr72XYZHTq
https://t.co/esFBGvvvCt
https://t.co/t0X0bpsYZI
https://t.co/akB0tGqwfB
https://t.co/pfRi6SxqW5
Thread on beheadings by H!ndus
(1/n) https://t.co/jr72XYZHTq
Radical Hindutva Extremists
— Dhruv Rathee \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@dhruv_rathee) January 3, 2021
= Radical Islamic Extremists - Beheading + Mob Lynching
+ "At least we don't behead people, be happy"
https://t.co/esFBGvvvCt
https://t.co/t0X0bpsYZI
https://t.co/akB0tGqwfB
https://t.co/pfRi6SxqW5
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
