#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde will shortly consider today a batch of PILs seeking removal of farmers protesting at Delhi borders against farm laws.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I just received a message.
CJI: We don’t have any information of him appearing.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Courtmaster informs CJI that no AOR has informed of Salve’s appearance.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Tiwari continues his submissions.
CJI: This is such an important matter. Why can’t you argue it properly ? We are asking, what is your standing, your issues and your prayer.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: Please don’t interrupt us, there’s no case of Salve before us.
Om Prakash Parihar makes submissions now.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: How many people had blocked the road there ? Will the number of people not determine this ? Who will take responsibility ? There can be no precedent in law and order situation.
CJI asks the Petitioners if the organisations have been added. Parihar responds that there is no information of the organisations.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Parihar: Then the Court will say that we are relying on newspaper reports and dismiss this.
CJI: You should be assisting the Court. Don’t unnecessarily argue with us.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
“I don’t know if this is the farmer’s fault or the government’s fault”.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt
Mani submits that he knows the pain of protesting in the peak cold.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I have not blocked the road.
SG: The farmers are protesting and roads have been blocked by Delhi Police.
CJI: So, the only party who is actually on ground is you.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: Bhartiya Kisan Union. The government will not do anything against the interest of farmers. Sit with the government clause by clause, then there can be a discussion or debate with an open mind.
SG: I can give you the name within ten minutes. Immediately I can think of Bhartiya Kisan.
Adv. Rahul Mehra, GNCTD appears: No efforts have been made to check the veracity of the claims of the Petitioners and to show the authenticity.
SG: He seems to be appearing for some farmer organisation.
Mehra: I can also say that you are appearing for something else.
SG: Yes, we will talk over call.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
More from Live Law
More from Court
so @tedwheeler did you hear? today we are discussing "public whippings" thanks to @JamesBuchal
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
@MultCoDA https://t.co/GgR1rCGIdG @OregonStateBar @BrentWeisberg @USAO_OR
— braingarbage (@braingarbage) November 28, 2020
Even if this is a "joke" or a drunk tweet, it appears that he is inciting gender-based violence on a woman via Twitter@twittersupport pic.twitter.com/TcaBiQ2wvU
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.