Why did SEBI fined Mukesh Ambani?

A detailed thread. 🧶

On January 1st SEBI ordered billionaire Mukesh Ambani and his conglomerate Reliance Industries Ltd. to pay a combined penalty of Rs 40 crores for alleged manipulative and fraudulent trading in the month of November 2007.

#mukeshambani #SEBI #RIL #Reliance
During the first week of November 2007, 12 entitiesā€Šā€”ā€Šall connected to Reliance Industries Limited decided to bet against Reliance Petroleum limited.Ā 
The12 agents decided to bet against RPL using what is called a futures contract.
In this context, it means, the agents were hoping to make a windfall on the back of a steep decline in RPL’s stock price.Ā  The steeper the decline in stock price, the more money the agents were standing to make.
And if the stock price rallied, they were looking at losing a lot of money as well. So you have to have a fair bit of gumption to make such a trade.Ā  Unless… you knew for certain that the stock price was poised to tumbleā€Šā€”ā€ŠWhich is what SEBI believes actually happened.
On November 29, 2007, just 10 minutes before the end of trading, Reliance Industries limited sold close to 2 crore shares of RPL. The selling triggered mass panic and within a moment’s notice, the stock price collapsed.
So SEBI contests that RIL and the agents colluded together in a bid to profit off of this transaction. How much money did they make?

Ā  Rs447 crores according to the regulator!
Making such trades isn’t illegal per se. But the thing isā€Šā€”ā€ŠThe agents hadn’t disclosed their relationship with RIL when placing their bets, giving regular retail investors the impression that these were independent trades made by random people not associated with RIL.
That is a bit dubious. But there is moreā€Šā€”ā€ŠTogether they were trading volumes far beyond the permissible limit.Ā  Now the counsel for RIL argued that this is a farce. None of them had individually breached the limits imposed by SEBIā€Šā€”ā€Šexcept for two agents, which was dealt with.
However, SEBI refused to look at the equation this way. They knew the 12 agents were acting at the behest of Reliance Industries Limited. They knew they could only make trades authorized by RIL.
So even if they hadn’t breached the limits at the individual level, they most certainly did so as a group. And since RIL had no authority to trade such large volumes, it was illegal for them to ask the agents to do so.
But RIL had one more defence. See, the company had already decided to sell shares of Reliance Petroleum Limited in a board meeting earlier. They were doing this in a bid to raise some extra money and it was perfectly legal for them to do so.
But here’s the thingā€Šā€”ā€ŠAt the time they believed RPL’s stock price was overvalued and they knew that if it suffered a sharp erosion in value, they wouldn’t have been able to raise the money they originally intended.
So they claimed they were simply asking their agents to trade those futures just so that they could make some extra money in the event the stock price did collapse.
Offsetting their losses.Ā 
Protecting their downside.Ā 
ā€œHedging,ā€ their bets so to speak.Ā 
But SEBI notes that there is no documentary evidence to support this claim.
So clearly SEBI wasn’t buying this argument. And back in 2017, the regulator mandated RIL and its agents to pay Rs 1,000 crores for their misdeeds. In addition, the Friday’s judgment imposes an additional penalty on RIL, Mukesh Ambani and two other entities.
Now this one is a bit tricky because RIL has always contested that two senior officers were responsible for the trades. They argued that Mukesh Ambani had nothing to do with this. But once again, SEBI refused to acknowledge this assessment.
And in the end, imposed fines of Rs 25 crores and Rs 15 crores on Reliance Industries Ltd. and Ambani, respectively.Ā 

Retweet if you liked the thread.
Follow for more such upcoming threads.

Soure : Finshots.

More from India

Some readers have been asking what #India2030 is all about.
Here’s a chapter-by-chapter thread on the 20 forecasts by 20 thought leaders on 20 themes that will define India in the 2020s.
1/n


Chapter 20 of #India2030 by @davidfrawleyved talks about how the Civilizational Resurgence of India will reconnect its ancient past to ride into a dharmic future
2/n

Chapter 19 of #India2030 by @devdip tells us what the new idea of Nationalism in the 2020s will be — an integral union of the nation with the self
3/n

Chapter 18 of #India2030 by @sandipanthedeb examines how ideologies and technologies will intrude into and redefine Friendships
4/n

Chapter 17 of #India2030 by @authoramish studies the Soft Power of India and says its global influence will be through the confluence of materialism and spiritualism
5/n

You May Also Like

1/ā€œWhat would need to be true for you to….Xā€

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, ā€œXā€ could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- ā€œFeel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- ā€œFeel that we’re in a good place as a companyā€
- ā€œFeel that we’re on the same pageā€
- ā€œFeel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is ā€œwhat would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?ā€

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.