newly minted champion of hindus, sri sri @ncbn saar.. you might have forgotten we haven't.

your own "scheme" of Divya Darshanam i.e sending 1.3 lakh poor hindus to pilgrimage.

cost: 100 crs.

borne by - TTD & 7 major temples.

cost to tax-payer: 0. Z-E-R-O. 1+

Scheme -
RO plant at Srisailam.

Development works or Construction works at various temples across AP.

Kalyana Mantapas at various places in AP.

cost: a few hundred crores.

borne by: TTD

cost to tax-payer: 0. Z-E-R-O. 2+
Scheme -
Construction works at various temples across AP.

Kalyana Mantapas at various places in AP.

cost: a few hundred crores.

borne by: TTD

cost to tax-payer: 0. Z-E-R-O. 3+
Scheme -

Land for Bharat Electronics Ltd.

51 acres.

borne by: TTD

cost to tax-payer: 0. Z-E-R-O. 4+
Scheme -

Venkateswara Swamy temple at Amaravati. in CRDA limits.

Cost: 50 lakh per acre.

borne by; TTD

cost to tax-payer: 0. Z-E-R-O. 5+
in other words, for EVERY SINGLE "development" work done at ANY temple in Andhra Pradesh, we the hindus paid it ourselves via hundi either at TTD or any other temple in AP.

you did NOT spend a single rupee from tax payers.

Let's look at your spending on others 6+
Scheme -

Construction or repairing mosques in Andhra

cost: a few crores

borne by: Govt of AP i.e WE THE TAXPAYERS.

cost to taxpayers: 100% 7+
TTD paid for land at Amaravati to build temple at Amaravati.

what about muslims?

Scheme -

mosque at Amaravati.

borne by: WE THE TAX PAYERS

cost to taxpayers: 100% 8+
coming to xians - who you just said are involved in conversions. what did you do?

Scheme -

Churches in every village of AP

cost: a few hundred crores

borne by: WE THE TAXPAYERS

cost to taxpayers: 100% 9+
TTD paid money for land & construction at Amaravati.

dear @ncbn you gave money to muslims for their mosque. what about church in amavarati?

Scheme -
Church(es) at Amaravati

cost: a few crores.

borne by: WE THE TAXPAYERS

cost to taxpyers: 100% 10+
Scheme -

more churches in every corner on AP

cost: a few hundred crores

borne by: WE THE TAXPAYERS

cost to taxpayers: 100% 11+

in your words dear @ncbn "evaDabba sommani" icchavu?
[Remember the Divya Darshan trip for hindus which TTD had to pay 100 crores?? ]

Scheme -

Trip to Jerusalem.

cost: a few hundred crores

borne by: WE THE TAXPAYERS

cost to taxpayers: 100% 12+
so dear @ncbn @JaiTDP @naralokesh et al, it would be good if you can keep your trap shut about us Hindus.

we paid every single paisa you guys "spent" on us. we also paid every single paise you guys spent on muslims & xians.

so with due regards -- 13/13

More from Khatvaanga

More from India

You May Also Like

First update to https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL since the challenge ended – Medium links!! Go add your Medium profile now 👀📝 (thanks @diannamallen for the suggestion 😁)


Just added Telegram links to
https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL too! Now you can provide a nice easy way for people to message you :)


Less than 1 hour since I started adding stuff to https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL again, and profile pages are now responsive!!! 🥳 Check it out -> https://t.co/fVkEL4fu0L


Accounts page is now also responsive!! 📱✨


💪 I managed to make the whole site responsive in about an hour. On my roadmap I had it down as 4-5 hours!!! 🤘🤠🤘
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.