A2: I shall have no faith in Rama and Krishna who are believed to be incarnation of God nor shall I worship them
B: Buddha says Rama was his.
Ambedker's 22 vows Vs BUDDHISM
/Read it Full /
Ambedker-1: I shall have no faith in Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh nor shall I worship them
BUDDHISM: I believe in them as a subordinate to buddha, we have different philoshphical model regarding them,we have many eg ,My many sect...
Navayan and Buddhism of Ambedkar
— \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3Sonal \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@Dharma_Vaarta) January 2, 2021
BR Ambedkar announced to accept Buddhism on 14th October, 1956 in a press conference.
He formed a new sect Navayan inspite of following pre existing sects such as Mahayana, Vajrayan and Heenayan. pic.twitter.com/gQgYtSDzf7
A2: I shall have no faith in Rama and Krishna who are believed to be incarnation of God nor shall I worship them
B: Buddha says Rama was his.
B: Hindu goddess gauri and Ganesha is widely accepted by us we have our own mantra for them ,they seek dharini from buddha ,Our some sects worship them
B: Ok! This is acceptable,but we do have previous life/births of Buddha and rebirth ,which you Rejected
A5: I do not and shall not believe that Lord Buddha was the incarnation of Vishnu I believe this to be sheer madness and false
A6:I shall not perform ‘Shraddha’ nor shall I give ‘pind-dan
B: We have our own death ritual ,we don't have pind Dana but we have
mataka-dana ,vastra-pooja,burying of ashes also practice by my many sects;many Buddhist sutta accept that
B : Uf, what you said in your vows , above,how you interpreted Buddhist teachings ;??? Wah Wah
B: This is hate, buddha condemn this ;
Buddha praised Brahmins ,many great Buddhist acharya are brahmin only ! Many previous buddhas are brahmin only ? U will not allow buddha to give ceromonial sermon?
B: what about woman? ( On Lighter Note) Well good!
A10.hall endeavour to establish equality
A11.I shall follow the ‘noble eightfold path’ of the Buddha.
A12 .I shall follow the ‘paramitas’ prescribed by the Buddha
B : Ok ! 👍
A14.I shall not steal.
A15.I shall not tell lies
A16.I shall not commit carnal sins
A17.I shall not take intoxicants like liquor, drugs etc
B :👍
B: Good! But follow Complete Buddhist philosophy
B : You are Welcomed ,but This is hate ! Buddha Rejected wrong Practices not good philosophies
B : I am gettingAbrahamic feeling
A21.I believe that Iam having a rebirth
I solemnlydeclare and affirm that I shall hereafter leadmy life according to the principles and teachings of theBuddha his Dhamma
More from India
Hindutva does not belong to Modi nor his party, it belongs to the people as a unifying, decolonial ideology similar to pan-Africanism or Yugoslavism.
His own brand of "positive secularism" is even milder - deepening special rights and welfare schemes for religious minorities.
After the disbanding of the Hindu Mahasabha and Jana Sangh, Hindutva as a political ideology does not even exist, except as a bogeyman in the minds of the Anglophone elite.
Even the BJP gave up Hindutva for civic nationalism, Gandhian socialism, and positive secularism in 1980s.
Under Modi, there has been compete policy continuity on minority rights and welfare from the Congress era, with little to no "Hindutva agenda" coming to see the light of day.
The most radical policy they can dream of is religion-neutral laws and equal rights for equal citizens.
Hindutva was essential in forming a national consciousness, but was abandoned with time. The modern BJP refuses to self-identify as a Hindutva movement, adopting moderates like Sardar Patel, Deendayal Upadhyay, and JP Narayan as their icons, rather than Savarkar or the Mahasabha.
When they say Hindu Rashtra, all they mean is an "Indic polity".
When British India was partitioned into a Muslim homeland and a Dharmic homeland, one state became a 'Ghazi' garrison state, and one the successor state to the Indic
His own brand of "positive secularism" is even milder - deepening special rights and welfare schemes for religious minorities.
I'm not entirely comfortable with Modi's "Hindutva".
— Onye Nkuzi (@cchukudebelu) February 2, 2021
I know many of my Indian followers will come at me, angrily - but let me just say this out.
I'm not sure it is a great model for democracy in a diverse, multi-cultural developing nation.
After the disbanding of the Hindu Mahasabha and Jana Sangh, Hindutva as a political ideology does not even exist, except as a bogeyman in the minds of the Anglophone elite.
Even the BJP gave up Hindutva for civic nationalism, Gandhian socialism, and positive secularism in 1980s.
Under Modi, there has been compete policy continuity on minority rights and welfare from the Congress era, with little to no "Hindutva agenda" coming to see the light of day.
The most radical policy they can dream of is religion-neutral laws and equal rights for equal citizens.
Hindutva was essential in forming a national consciousness, but was abandoned with time. The modern BJP refuses to self-identify as a Hindutva movement, adopting moderates like Sardar Patel, Deendayal Upadhyay, and JP Narayan as their icons, rather than Savarkar or the Mahasabha.
When they say Hindu Rashtra, all they mean is an "Indic polity".
When British India was partitioned into a Muslim homeland and a Dharmic homeland, one state became a 'Ghazi' garrison state, and one the successor state to the Indic
