Dumb£dk@r wasn't like Pe£riyar?

He was an Anti-Hindu m0r0n just like Periy@r.

Yes it's true that he criticised K2@s but that doesn't make him any useful for Hindus.

His writings will remind you a lot of JNU Urban Naxals like Kanhaiya.
"Ancient Hindus had no sexual morals, brother cohabited with sister, son with mother, father with daughter... Men freely shared women & none had exclusive right over her... Prostitution flourished in the worst form...bestiality prevailed, done even by Rishis."
Riddles in Hinduism
This is what Shri Ram said in Kishkindha-Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana regarding such immoral relationships.

But how could Neela Katt@ppa not realize this?

Because he severely lacking analytical capabilities of Hindu texts.
"Hindu Gods were miserable cowards who had to hide behind their wives to save themselves from Asuras. How could these cowards give power to Shakti? Did the Brahmins invent the practice of worshipping of Goddesses to put a new commodity in the market?"

Riddles in Hinduism.
Pay attention to his language.

He considered Gods and Goddesses as a 'commodity.'
So much for feminism.

What was this alleged FeMiNi$t's problem if Hindu Goddesses were powerful?
What nonsense! Indradeva r@ped Ahalya?

Is having intercourse with consent of the female termed r@pe?

The moron never read Valmiki Ramayana otherwise the idiot won’t have written such $h!t.
He doesn't stop here.

He had a whole book to rant againt Hindu texts and Hindu Gods after all.

Just imagine the type of toxic thinking he had.
Dumbedkar the b@$t#rd said Shri Rama's birth was "disreputable", and called Rama an illegitimate child of sage Shrung.

This was tweeted by @BharadwajSpeaks previously in 2019.
His book- Annih!lation of C@ste.

'Reforms' by Neel@ Katt@ppa.

Apparently, he wanted to penalize even discussion of Hindu texts in public and end to the sacred status of Vedas and other Hindu sacred texts by law.
Abolishment of Preisthood among Hindus.

Selection by the State? We know how that would've turned out.
His other 'golden' ideas would've made Hindu preists a sl@ve of the secular state.
He was so proud of his k!n for helping the British to conquer India & begged his Br!tish masters to fulfill their responsibility towards them.
Freedom Struggle had been carried out by only Upper Caste Hindus (they were the majority who fought for freedom) only not LCs according to him.
His views on Freedom movement and the major classes fighting for freedom i.e. Brahmins and Vaishyas are-

It's interesting how he compared Brahmins & Vaishyas to Nazis.

Sounds like something JNU m0r0ns, Commies & Tukde-Tukde gang usually say. (Because they copy his ideas!)
Certainly he wasn't a freedom fighter or advocate of freedom movement.

He was as pro-Hindu as Kanhaiya Kumar.😆

How is our spineless R$$-Bhajip@0 glorifying him if he abused Shri Ram, wanted end of Hinduism & Hindu texts by all means?

2 words- Vote bank.

More from India

You May Also Like

(1) Kushner is worth $324 million.
(2) Since 2016, Kushner has connived, with Saudi help, to force the Qataris (literally at a ship's gunpoint) to "loan" him $900 million.
(3) This is consistent with the Steele dossier.
(4) Kushner is unlikely to ever have to pay the "loan" back.


2/ So as you read about his tax practices, you should take from it that it's practices of this sort that ensure that he's able to extort money from foreign governments while Trump is POTUS without ever having to pay the money back. It also explains why he's in the Saudis' pocket.

3/ It's why the Saudis *say* he's in their pocket. It's why emoluments and federal bribery statutes matter. It's why Kushner was talking to the Saudi Crown Prince the day before the murdered Washington Post journalist was taken. It's why the Trump administration now does nothing.
🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"