More from Pranay Prasun
#MAITHANALLOYS Further update š
Rounding Bottom pattern š§ https://t.co/EONRI5MOSZ
Rounding Bottom pattern š§ https://t.co/EONRI5MOSZ
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E03G7iuX0AIaMsS.png)
#Maithanalloys
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) May 3, 2021
Highlighted this gem on 21st March at 560 level for big target.\U0001f918
Added to my portfolio after breakout (660 level)
Go through below thread for more details \U0001f447 https://t.co/IPRYa7pLlV
Another one #LupinšÆ
**Don't miss this move**
All alerts in advanceš„š
Expecting breakout retest in weekly chart near 1130 level
**Don't miss this move**
All alerts in advanceš„š
#LUPIN #cnxpharma Consolidation Consolidation & Consolidation
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) April 18, 2021
but in tight range \U0001f9d0\U0001f447@Jitendra_stock @gogrithekhabri @piyushchaudhry @caniravkaria https://t.co/8G4KQjYM4i pic.twitter.com/yDIX71tnOp
Expecting breakout retest in weekly chart near 1130 level
More from Iex
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x