As someone who has studied healthcare handoffs for a while, I can’t stop thinking about the Presidential one coming up. I see I’m not the only one. But this is not like any handoff. My nerdy 🧵 #MedTwitter #Inauguration2021

Handoffs come in many flavors in medicine. In general, the highest risk handoffs are when the patient is really sick and the handoff is permanent and not temporary. So in some ways, yes has elements of a risky handoff. America is definitely sick and the handoff is permanent.
Ideal handoffs are a transfer of content and a transfer of professional responsibility. The goal of content transfer: to achieve a shared mental model or shared vision of the patient. Professional responsibility usu= does receiver accept? Now it’s been will sender relinquish?
While both parts key, the transfer of professional responsibility is a must. The transfer of content also rests on the quality and accuracy of information transferred, the sender investment to transfer the information, and the receivers ability to understand & act on it.
In this case, there is concern no or sparse content is transferred. Even with a checklist, there may reason to question the content. In fact, too much dependency on content during any handoff could actually harm decision making of the person taking over due to an anchoring bias.
The clinical assumptions we make typically are the outgoing team is trying to do their best and that their vision is accurate. many assume the new team is a risk because continuity of care is important. That is true a lot when the team is invested and care is going well.
But when the care is not going well, a new team can bring lots to the table: fresh eyes, a new perspective, better expertise, higher morale as they may not be burned out and will be more invested in doing better.
The other thing about continuity is sometimes it’s provided in other ways. The team may change but maybe not everyone leaves at the same time preserving some continuity. E.g. there are many career public servants, like Dr Fauci, across agencies who can help with filling gaps.
We can’t also forget the importance of empowering patients and caregivers during healthcare handoffs —in that way an activated engaged democracy is important too. We are and can be the helpers. Fitting to think about before #MLKDay and the importance of service.
So while handoffs are certainly vulnerable and we should be on the lookout for risks, I always say the handoff is also a learning opportunity and could even improve care. In this case, many typical assumptions don’t even apply and a new approach maybe what we need most.
I’m actually writing this as my husband is picking up a service and Wednesday is our resident switch day so here’s to anyone starting a new rotation this week! H/t @ETSshow @aoglasser @WrayCharles @ShikhaJainMD for forwarding many handoff tweets prompting this.
tagging some great thinkers on this or related #ptsafety topics. @leorahorwitzmd @jdensonMD @LekshmiMD @jeannemfarnan @nvhstewart @DrStephMueller @kathlynsafedoc @sumantranji @ChrisMoriates @ReshmaGuptaMD @subhaairan @karynbaum @_plyons @JulieJKJohnson @Bob_Wachter @kgshojania
h/t those who support the geekiness @alikhan28 @MDaware @krupali @gradydoctor @AmmahStarr @arghavan_salles @drjessigold @nvhstewart @neel_shah @choo_ek @darakass @meganranney @ErinSandersNP @thehowie @JosephSakran @HelenBurstin @DrSimpsonHSR @dr_msharma @yejnes @BobDohertyACP

More from Health

You May Also Like

THREAD: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ

1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE


2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less.
https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n


3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)

(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)


4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.

For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3


5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)
Oh my Goodness!!!

I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!

Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!


Has this man been concealing his true identity?

Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?

Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!

Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?


Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??


Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?

Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.


#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.