As someone who has studied healthcare handoffs for a while, I can’t stop thinking about the Presidential one coming up. I see I’m not the only one. But this is not like any handoff. My nerdy 🧵 #MedTwitter #Inauguration2021

Handoffs come in many flavors in medicine. In general, the highest risk handoffs are when the patient is really sick and the handoff is permanent and not temporary. So in some ways, yes has elements of a risky handoff. America is definitely sick and the handoff is permanent.
Ideal handoffs are a transfer of content and a transfer of professional responsibility. The goal of content transfer: to achieve a shared mental model or shared vision of the patient. Professional responsibility usu= does receiver accept? Now it’s been will sender relinquish?
While both parts key, the transfer of professional responsibility is a must. The transfer of content also rests on the quality and accuracy of information transferred, the sender investment to transfer the information, and the receivers ability to understand & act on it.
In this case, there is concern no or sparse content is transferred. Even with a checklist, there may reason to question the content. In fact, too much dependency on content during any handoff could actually harm decision making of the person taking over due to an anchoring bias.
The clinical assumptions we make typically are the outgoing team is trying to do their best and that their vision is accurate. many assume the new team is a risk because continuity of care is important. That is true a lot when the team is invested and care is going well.
But when the care is not going well, a new team can bring lots to the table: fresh eyes, a new perspective, better expertise, higher morale as they may not be burned out and will be more invested in doing better.
The other thing about continuity is sometimes it’s provided in other ways. The team may change but maybe not everyone leaves at the same time preserving some continuity. E.g. there are many career public servants, like Dr Fauci, across agencies who can help with filling gaps.
We can’t also forget the importance of empowering patients and caregivers during healthcare handoffs —in that way an activated engaged democracy is important too. We are and can be the helpers. Fitting to think about before #MLKDay and the importance of service.
So while handoffs are certainly vulnerable and we should be on the lookout for risks, I always say the handoff is also a learning opportunity and could even improve care. In this case, many typical assumptions don’t even apply and a new approach maybe what we need most.
I’m actually writing this as my husband is picking up a service and Wednesday is our resident switch day so here’s to anyone starting a new rotation this week! H/t @ETSshow @aoglasser @WrayCharles @ShikhaJainMD for forwarding many handoff tweets prompting this.
tagging some great thinkers on this or related #ptsafety topics. @leorahorwitzmd @jdensonMD @LekshmiMD @jeannemfarnan @nvhstewart @DrStephMueller @kathlynsafedoc @sumantranji @ChrisMoriates @ReshmaGuptaMD @subhaairan @karynbaum @_plyons @JulieJKJohnson @Bob_Wachter @kgshojania
h/t those who support the geekiness @alikhan28 @MDaware @krupali @gradydoctor @AmmahStarr @arghavan_salles @drjessigold @nvhstewart @neel_shah @choo_ek @darakass @meganranney @ErinSandersNP @thehowie @JosephSakran @HelenBurstin @DrSimpsonHSR @dr_msharma @yejnes @BobDohertyACP

More from Health

1/16
Why do B12 and folate deficiencies lead to HUGE red blood cells?

And, if the issue is DNA synthesis, why are red blood cells (which don't have DNA) the key cell line affected?

For answers, we'll have to go back a few billion years.


2/
RNA came first. Then, ~3-4 billion years ago, DNA emerged.

Among their differences:
🔹RNA contains uracil
🔹DNA contains thymine

But why does DNA contains thymine (T) instead of uracil (U)?

https://t.co/XlxT6cLLXg


3/
🔑Cytosine (C) can undergo spontaneous deamination to uracil (U).

In the RNA world, this meant that U could appear intensionally or unintentionally. This is clearly problematic. How can you repair RNA when you can't tell if something is an error?

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


4/
DNA's use of T instead of U means that spontaneous C → U deamination can be corrected without worry that an intentional U is being removed.

DNA requires greater stability than RNA so the transition to a thymine-based structure was beneficial.

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


5/
Let's return to megaloblastic anemia secondary to B12 or folate deficiency.

When either is severely deficient deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP*) production is hindered. With less dTMP, DNA synthesis is abnormal.

[*Note: thymine is the base in dTMP]

https://t.co/AnDUtKkbZh
this simple, counter narrative fact keeps cropping up all over the world.

hospital and ICU utilization has been and remains low this year.

it's terribly curious that so few of these monitoring tools provide historical baselines.

getting them is like pulling teeth.


we might think of this as an oversight until you see stuff like this:

this woman was arrested for filming and sharing the fact that their are empty hospitals in the UK.

that's full blown soviet. what possible honest purpose does that

this is the action of a police state and a propaganda ministry, not a well intentioned government and a public heath agency.

"we cannot let people see the truth for fear they might base their actions on real facts" is not much of a mantra for just governance.


90% full ICU sounds scary until you realize that 90-100% full is normal in flu season.

staffed ICU beds are expensive to leave empty. it's like flying with 15% of the plane empty. hospitals don't do that.

and all US hospitals are mandated to be able to flex to 120% ICU.

the US is currently at historically low ICU utilization for this time of year.

61% is "you're all going to go out of business" territory as is 66% full hospital use.

can you blame them for mining CARES act money? they'll die without it.

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.