12 things you should look out for before buying health insurance
A thread 🧵
You have to be a little wary of policies that come with co-pay. With co-pay, you need to pay a pre-decided amount from your own pocket whenever you make a claim.
The larger your expenses, the larger you’ll end up spending your own money, even with insurance.
This is something you need to be conscious of when making choices during hospitalization. Let’s deep dive into what will happen if your policy doesn’t have a room rent limit and when it does.
You have a health insurance cover of ₹15 lakhs, with *no room-rent limit*. You get treated for a condition that costs you ₹2 lakhs, and you paid ₹15,000 in room rent per day.
You have a health insurance cover of ₹15 lakhs, with a room rent limit of ₹12,000 per day. You get treated for a condition that costs you ₹2 lakhs, but you stayed in a room that costs you ₹15,000/day.
In this case, each component in your cost is proportionately deducted (12/15*cost), and therefore, you can only claim ₹1,60,000 of your total expenditure.
Check the attached image to understand how your claim amount gets reduced.
You might have thought the room rent doesn't matter as much - but it does.
During this period after you purchase a policy, you cannot make any claim. It’s typically between 30 to 90 days. This waiting period is waived in the event of an accident that leads to immediate hospitalization.
This applies to pre-existing diseases (like diabetes) present when a health insurance policy is bought. The insurer will accept your claims for treatment related to these diseases only if the waiting period you agreed upon has passed.
This means that the insurer applies a limit on the amount you can claim for treatments for specified conditions and diseases.
Save yourself that shock by going through the rest of this thread and also bookmarking it :)
After you buy a policy, you can cancel it within a certain free-look period, stating your reasons.
However, the insurer will not refund any medical tests, stamp duty charges done during this period.
The free-look period is typically 15 to 30 days.
This is the facility given by the insurer to you, for covering your pre and post-hospitalization expenses.
This will go a long way in saving you a lot of money (and stress!)
This means single-day treatments like eye surgery, etc. are covered by your health insurance policy.
Several common treatments require single day hospitalization, so you need to totally make sure that these are covered.
If you don't make any claim in a year, the insurer will reward you by increasing your coverage amount (with a max limit).
No claim bonuses are good-to-have on your policy.
If your policy has a domiciliary cover (quite some insurance-speak!), it means that you can claim money when you are treated at home.
This is great during these times because it’s really difficult to find hospital beds during the pandemic.
If you’ve completed 8 years of coverage, the insurer cannot reject an eligible claim, for any reason except for proven frauds and exclusions made in the policy documents.
If you spot these words, it means the insurance company provides you with a free health check-up.
More from Health
No-regret #hydrogen:
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.
👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em
The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)
Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)
Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)
In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.
👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em
The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)
Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)
Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)
In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
You May Also Like
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
