Pregnancy in the pandemic: a thread (1/ a lot). The NHS has finally changed its guidance to say women should be allowed to have their partner there 'at all times': scans, in labour ward from the start and not just for 'active labour'. I gave birth 8 days ago.

I found out I was pregnant with my first child on the day the UK went into 1st lockdown. Many people asked me how my pregnancy was going over the past few months. I’d say: “it’s not an easy time to be pregnant!” Most would reply: “it’s never an easy time!” Sure... but a pandemic?
I love the NHS. My doctor mother gave all her working life to it, my brother is now set to do the same. This is not a criticism of most of its staff who - long before Covid happened - have been people I championed in many of my columns.
But the major problem over the past nine months has been access to in-person care. Before I was 38 weeks pregnant (technically full term though I didn’t deliver until 40 weeks and 6 days), I had seen a midwife in person twice. You can’t check blood pressure over the phone.
Nor can you be measured or examined, and the midwife is less able to spot signs of big problems (eg issues like domestic violence, which can start/ flare up in pregnancy). One of my phone appointments lasted about 5 minutes; another I missed because they only called 5 hours late
My husband, the best partner any woman could wish for, wasn’t allowed to attend my 12-week or 20 week scan. The 20-week scan did not go perfectly. I was there for 4 hours with my husband sitting outside in the car. They kept repeating it, worried my baby had a hole in his heart
I left the hospital very upset. My mother suggested she pay for me to have a private scan (anathema to her). I had been worried about the cost of doing that. But when I looked into it, there were big delays because women were getting extra scans so their partners could be there.
Anyway, the brilliant NHS delivered here in the end. My mum had been adamant I should give birth in a teaching hospital (thank you @KingsCollegeNHS) and a nurse called saying I should come back. The foetal cardiologist wasn’t happy with my scans and he would oversee another one.
That ended up being fine. Staff were great. But the stress had been tough and made so much tougher as my husband hadn’t been there. At one appointment I sat next to a woman who had just been diagnosed with gestational diabetes and was crying that she’s had to find that out alone.
We were lucky. When I started talking about these issues on here and on the radio many months ago, women contacted me to say they had had to end unviable pregnancies without their partner there or had been told they had lost their babies while on their own.
Kings changed its policy (hooray!) so my husband could come to my 36 week scan (or rather come join us half-way through). But I have often felt that I was doing this all so much more alone than either of us would have liked. Which brings me to the birth and its “aftermath”.
My contractions started on sun evening (6th Dec). The labour ward tell you not to come in too early, but I started vomiting and was in intense pain. We got there at 430am and my husband was made to stay outside. I could barely stand or think.
I have never felt more vulnerable than I did in those moments and I needed him there. Thankfully I was v slightly dilated so they decided he was allowed in (I have no idea how long I was on my own since I was in agony).
I won’t go into the details of the labour here but the short version is that I eventually had an epidural which unfortunately fell out, leaving me in agony. My husband was the one who spotted what had gone wrong. At other hospitals, he still wouldn’t have been in the room...
I gave birth last Tuesday after about 36 hours in labour. I was exhausted and on antibiotics (via a drip) as was my baby. And now I had to start breastfeeding etc.
After birth, Kings has a much more generous visiting policy for pregnant women during Covid than other hospitals. People have told me about still not being able to visit at all. My husband was allowed to be there for 10 hours a day - but that still meant I had 14 hours by myself
The midwives were almost universally wonderful. But it’s not the same as having a husband there. I hated having to leave my day-old baby on his own so I could go to the loo, for example.
(I should add that there is a particular weird context here which is that I was trolled a month before I gave birth after a pile-on caused by another hack and received a threat that someone would come to the ward and kill my baby. That was nice...)
I promise this thread is winding up. But one further issue is that it also matters what happens after you are discharged. Partly as I struggled in hospital to breastfeed after a bad (and v long) labour, my baby developed jaundice. I spent Friday night in A&E with a sick baby.
Imagine doing that on your own mere hours after being discharged from hospital and mere days after labour. Thankfully my husband was allowed in (we thought he wouldn’t be) because a lovely doctor took the view that I still counted as a patient. I could have kissed her.
Finally I wanted to flag the brilliant work of some people on this issue. @PregnantScrewed have been superstars, as always, as has @stellacreasy and @aliciakearns. And I was thrilled that the brilliant @AVMikhailova took up this issue when she moved to the Mail on Sunday.
My story has a lot more to it: I developed severe pelvic girdle pain and couldn’t get physio etc - but really I am now just so happy this guy is here. And I know I am so much luckier than a lot of new parents - who have had an even tougher time during the pandemic.
And a huge, huge thank you to the staff at @KingsCollegeNHS, who are some (a lot!) of the best people I have ever met. I have always loved that hospital.

More from Health

You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇
this simple, counter narrative fact keeps cropping up all over the world.

hospital and ICU utilization has been and remains low this year.

it's terribly curious that so few of these monitoring tools provide historical baselines.

getting them is like pulling teeth.


we might think of this as an oversight until you see stuff like this:

this woman was arrested for filming and sharing the fact that their are empty hospitals in the UK.

that's full blown soviet. what possible honest purpose does that

this is the action of a police state and a propaganda ministry, not a well intentioned government and a public heath agency.

"we cannot let people see the truth for fear they might base their actions on real facts" is not much of a mantra for just governance.


90% full ICU sounds scary until you realize that 90-100% full is normal in flu season.

staffed ICU beds are expensive to leave empty. it's like flying with 15% of the plane empty. hospitals don't do that.

and all US hospitals are mandated to be able to flex to 120% ICU.

the US is currently at historically low ICU utilization for this time of year.

61% is "you're all going to go out of business" territory as is 66% full hospital use.

can you blame them for mining CARES act money? they'll die without it.
Now you know I love to sh-t in Harvard. But I also like accuracy. So I decided to go look at Harvard’s catalog to see its lack of military history that this article describes (they only teach history of pets it claims) and what I found shocked me! Shocked me! A thread: 1/


First off, Harvard students literally have multiple sections of military history that they can take listed. (It appears these ones are taught at MIT, so they might have to walk down the street for these) but... 2/


Say they want to stay on campus...they can only take numerous classes on war and diplomacy...3/


They have an entire class on Yalta. That’s right. An entire class on Yalta. 4/


But wait! There is more! They can take the British Empire, The Fall of the Roman Empire for those wanting traditional topics... 5/

You May Also Like

हिमालय पर्वत की एक बड़ी पवित्र गुफा थी।उस गुफा के निकट ही गंगा जी बहती थी।एक बार देवर्षि नारद विचरण करते हुए वहां आ पहुंचे।वह परम पवित्र गुफा नारद जी को अत्यंत सुहावनी लगी।वहां का मनोरम प्राकृतिक दृश्य,पर्वत,नदी और वन देख उनके हृदय में श्रीहरि विष्णु की भक्ति अत्यंत बलवती हो उठी।


और देवर्षि नारद वहीं बैठकर तपस्या में लीन हो गए।इन्द्र नारद की तपस्या से घबरा गए।उन्हें हमेशा की तरह अपना सिंहासन व स्वर्ग खोने का डर सताने लगा।इसलिए इन्द्र ने नारद की तपस्या भंग करने के लिए कामदेव को उनके पास भेज दिया।वहां पहुंच कामदेव ने अपनी माया से वसंतऋतु को उत्पन्न कर दिया।


पेड़ और पौधों पर रंग बिरंगे फूल खिल गए और कोयलें कूकने लगी,पक्षी चहकने लगे।शीतल,मंद,सुगंधित और सुहावनी हवा चलने लगी।रंभा आदि अप्सराएं नाचने लगीं ।किन्तु कामदेव की किसी भी माया का नारद पे कोई प्रभाव नहीं पड़ा।तब कामदेव को डर सताने लगा कि कहीं नारद क्रोध में आकर मुझे श्राप न देदें।

जैसे ही नारद ने अपनी आंखें खोली, उसी क्षण कामदेव ने उनसे क्षमा मांगी।नारद मुनि को तनिक भी क्रोध नहीं आया और उन्होने शीघ्र ही कामदेव को क्षमा कर दिया।कामदेव प्रसन्न होकर वहां से चले गए।कामदेव के चले जाने पर देवर्षि के मन में अहंकार आ गया कि मैने कामदेव को हरा दिया।

नारद फिर कैलाश जा पहुंचे और शिवजी को अपनी विजयगाथा सुनाई।शिव समझ गए कि नारद अहंकारी हो गए हैं और अगर ये बात विष्णु जी जान गए तो नारद के लिए अच्छा नहीं होगा।ये सोचकर शिवजी ने नारद को भगवन विष्णु को ये बात बताने के लीए मना किया। परंतु नारद जी को ये बात उचित नहीं लगी।
Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.


After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be
https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year


as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.