More from Nikita Poojary

More from Hdfcbank

#HDFCBANK ~A Thread 🧵
Let's look at the Multi-TF Technical aspect~

In weekly; Price marked by converging trend lines.

Representing consolidation prior to continuing in the direction of existing trend.

Sustenance above 1531 and a break-through at 1579.35 would trigger 1640+

+


In daily; it's showing a counter-trend move that has followed after a sharp price movement.

Rejection level at 1579.35 which needs to be breached for extended upside.

Both Weekly and daily charts are indicating the resumption of the prior trend.

+


It has been on my radar since August series and I have been watching out for these levels to be neatly breached for a bullish move.


The news is also favorable for #HDFCBANK.

In their last commentary, Bank said~ the transportation finance disbursements are 110% of May numbers.
July was 40% higher than the month of June and August was twenty 25% higher than July.

+

Bank is very upbeat about it's growth in rural and semi-rural areas.

Right now they are active in total of 1 Lac villages.

Within two years they aim to expand it to 2 Lac villages as it's going to be major part of their loan book.

+

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?