Categories Government
Irrigation schemes in sub-Saharan Africa are consistently falling short of their promises
https://t.co/F9OlCXfKPZ
#africa #irrigation
‘We feel incredibly betrayed’: Thousands of Guardsmen forced to vacate Capitol
https://t.co/laCWjytrLn
#military #deployment #domestic
The New York Times Introduces a Web Site
https://t.co/0e0vadzDyS
#websites #anniversaries #journalism #newspapers
How will Democrats’ control of an evenly-divided Senate work? | US Elections 2020 News | Al Jazeera
https://t.co/nK5irhQQIO
#government #PartisanPolitics
Connecting the Dots
On Dec 15, I created a thread which showed that the City of Austin did in fact have a contract w Solarwinds which was procured through Insight Public Sector. SolarWinds hack linked toRussian group — APT29 aka Cozy
1. CITY of AUSTIN :
— Blue Canaries (@CanariesBlue) December 15, 2020
You've been HACKED!
In Apr. 2019, the Austin City Council approved a contract w Insight Public Sector., a procurement company, in order to indirectly hire SolarWinds. pic.twitter.com/2v9cGgkr0F
demanding that media publish the presidents words with no editorial interference is exactly what the founders were worried about when they created 1A.
It\u2019s a little surreal to see the traditional anti-censorship discourse newly applied to the most powerful man in the world right after he incited a mob that attacked a rival branch of government to overturn a free and fair election.
— Matt Pearce \U0001f985 (@mattdpearce) January 9, 2021
free speech absolutists demand (checks notes) that the NYT allow Trump to write all its headlines.
the first amendment was not meant to allow the president to seize control of all media. it seems weird that you have to explain this to free speech defenders.
this is what happens though when you fetishize the speech act and completely lose track of what freedom of speech was supposed to do in the first place.
the president is literally the person the 1A is supposed to *protect media from.* It's supposed to allow media to criticize him and have an editorial policy independent of the government!
126 members of the @HouseGOP asked SCOTUS to throw out the results of democratic elections in GA, PA, WI and MI. 121 members voted AFTER terrorists stormed the capital to throw out the results in AZ. Upon reflection, 138 voted to throw out the results in PA a few hours later.
— Sean Casten (@SeanCasten) January 10, 2021
1/ Here's a list of the Members of Congress who signed onto the Amicus Brief to throw out the results in GA, PA, WI, MI.
2/ Here's the list of the 121 members who voted "Yea" to throw out the results of the Arizona election AFTER terrorists stormed the Capitol to do the same.
3/ Here's the list of the 138 members (yes, it went up!) who voted "Yea" 3 hours later to throw out the results of the Pennsylvania election.
4/ Now let's parse a bit. Here is a list of the #SeditionCaucus. Those members with three strikes. Signed onto Amicus brief, voted to throw out Arizona results and voted to throw out Pennsylvania results. There are 81 of them so this may take a few tweets.
These are some of the hashtags being used to identify rioters. #SeditionHunters
#StripesGuy
#StripesGuy assaulted Officer Daniel Hodges. Hodges says, he was \u201cpractically foaming at the mouth.\u201d He ripped his mask off, took his baton, beat officer Hodges with it and bloodied his face. @DCPoliceDept @FBIWFO #SeditionVids https://t.co/fZMBpwlyzs pic.twitter.com/cCJbaJTvE9
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
#ThePinMan
#ThePinMan assaulted and used a clear police shield to pin @DCPoliceDept Officer Daniel Hodges in a door jam. If you know this person call the FBI\u2019s Tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) @FBIWFO #SeditionVids pic.twitter.com/1vOyG3LWWx
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
#EyeGouger
#EyeGouger is wanted for assaulting a police officer and trying to gouge out his eye. If you know this person call the FBI\u2019s Tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) @DCPoliceDept @FBIWFO #SeditionVids pic.twitter.com/cwnADdlaqn
— Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) January 16, 2021
First-time GOP Congresswomen Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert might not have been among the fanatics who stormed the Capitol on January 6, but their views very much make them fanatics within that same building.https://t.co/lrDeHmNNgf
— Mona Eltahawy (@monaeltahawy) January 15, 2021
Marjorie Taylor Greene is dangerous and vile.
Marjorie Taylor Greene indicated support for executing prominent Democrats in 2018 and 2019 before running for Congress
Marjorie Taylor Greene is dangerous and vile.
Republican Who Endorsed School Shooting Conspiracies to Join House Education Panel
The pattern is:
GOP in power - GOP dictates policy
Dems in power - GOP dictates policy
Soooooooo what\u2019s the problem. The statement I responded to read as it they haven\u2019t been trying to work together.. but they have so..?
— Othello (@BurberryKid11) February 2, 2021
The Dems shouldn't legislate toward the GOP.
The GOP doesn't represent its constituents.
The GOP can push it's agenda on its own time.
If Dems push an agenda that actually helps people, it'll also actually help the GOP constituency.
The GOP won't. So give them nothing.
The Dems should ignore the GOP just like the GOP ignores the Dems.
Make them pay for every moment of obstruction.
Just a hard press on legislation that is unassailable and shine a light on the GOP.
Constant. Relentless. Unyielding.
Shut them out and shut them down.
The GOP is not a legitimate political party. It is an anti-democratic, fascist criminal syndicate with no interest whatsoever in governance.
Nobody should give them the slightest bit of credit or legitimacy ever again.
Not a fucking ounce.
Nobody should engage them in legitimate debate in Congress.
They should be pariahs and treated as unserious occupants of Congress.
Because these people were totally ok with their colleagues being killed in furtherance of the destruction of the insitution.
But let’s get nuanced for a minute...
NEW: Hawaii Rep. @TulsiGabbard introduces bill called \u2018Protect Women\u2019s Sports Act\u2019 \u2014 would clarify Title IX protections to be based on biological sex, which would impact transgender athletes participating in athletic programs for women and girls @KITV4 pic.twitter.com/VcDDgO1mFL
— Tom George (@TheTomGeorge) December 10, 2020
Do trans women and girls have an advantage in sports over other women and girls?
I’m here to provide a very unsatisfying answer: It depends.
What sport are we talking about?
How old are people competing in it?
What sort of hormone treatment has the person in question had and for how long?
Those are all factors that play into the fairness question.
Trying to implement broad policies in the name of ensuring fairness can actually have the opposite of the intended effect.
Take the case of Mack Beggs.
A few years back, Beggs was a high school student in Texas. He was a wrestler, and wanted to do it at the college level.
Beggs is a trans man, meaning his birth certificate said female on it. Like many trans guys, he takes testosterone as part of his medical transition.
He wanted to wrestle. Specifically, he wanted a spot on his school’s boys team.
He wasn’t allowed.