In 2009, I studied the history of the FBI/CIA and also the Hitler regime (research for a book). I expected it to be a dull errand, not a horrific realization that the evil methods of operation of US agencies were often indistinguishable in their actions from the N regime. AND...
The same is true if a society believes "there's never any justice anyway, so I no longer care... they're ALL evil".
a. Tolerate and accept evil actions that they use to frame/blackmail with
b. Develop apathy toward all evil, accepting, giving up on the fight
Therefore, in their best interest to
So... sometimes...
Agencies and others who appear to be fighting FOR the victims, are actually
In this way, the blackmail methods and materials that they've invested in, still give a solid return on that investment,
"Say this"
"Do this"
And they will.
The moment the blackmail material loses power, the Controllers lose power over their puppets.
In all of this, the victims of heinous crimes are
I'm writing this thread to share my conclusions after researching old records, in actual physical libraries, old dusty books no one reads.
Bad things that violate human rights & universally evil were already proven and documented to have been done by agencies.
The evil progressed because society progressed.
What's a blackmailer to do then?
What's still off limits?
And... it has a logical path.
It did happen.
There has been very little justice over the years.
The situation is ongoing.
THAT is the status, and many know it.
Blackmail material of the past, which may have been something as simple as a photograph of a quaint peck on the cheek as assumed proof of adultery,
However...
the blackmailers now
the downside to them is that there are too many operators and with many players, there will be stupid ones who mess things up.
They can't keep up with all of the mistakes.
More from Government
You May Also Like
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.