With the news that a dozen Republican senators plan to be openly hostile to #democracy on Jan. 6, and the understandable frenzy on social & the media about this, I want to be clear about 3 things:

1. Their stunt on Jan. 6 will fail. What happens after objections are raised to a state's slate of electors in both the House and the Senate, is that they each have to debate the issue and then vote. It can't take more than 2 hours.
The House has a Democratic majority, so there's zero chance that a state's electors will get thrown out. (Both the House and the Senate have to agree.) All this is, is political theatre and as such, it'll get a lot of attention and make Trump happy.
You don't have to take my word on this. Read @Teri_Kanefield's explainer here: https://t.co/wKLbeJoabx
2. So the obvious question is, if this stunt is doomed to fail, why in the world are these Republicans doing this?

Contrary to what this looks like, it's not about their fealty to Trump.
Ironically, it's about their OWN election hopes. The House Republicans who plan to object come from very red districts. They're worried about a primary from someone even more right-wing than they are in 2022. This vote is about shoring up the MAGA faithful vote.
The list of Senators who will object, including Hawley, are already on the list as potential 2024 presidential candidates (or are looking at a governor's seat.) Just wait for the avalanche of fundraising emails once they do this.
So, yes, it's deeply ironic that these Republicans are undermining a bedrock of our democracy -- free and fair elections and a peaceful transfer of power -- in order to get elected themselves.
3. My final point. Just because this is doomed to fail, and is only about their own re-election hopes, doesn't mean that this stunt isn't deeply, deeply damaging to our country.
Neither Trump nor the Republicans have a shred of evidence of voter fraud or irregularities with this election. No court, even up to SCOTUS, has agreed with any of their allegations. (Thank you, @marceelias)
What this is, is proof that @davidfrum was right all along when a few years ago he predicted this:

“If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. The will reject democracy.”
And so, while I want you to not worry about what will happen on Jan. 6, we need to have our eyes WIDE OPEN as to who these Republicans are: enemies of democracy.

I hope you will join me in pledging to protect our democracy, in every possible way, in the coming years.
#SeditionHasConsequences #SeditiousGOP

More from Government

Canada is failing to act on Climate Change. @wef @WorldBank @IMFNews @IPCC_CH @UNDPGAIN @AntiCorruptIntl @Pontifex @JustinWelby @OCCRP @StopCorpAbuse @TaxJusticeNet @FairTaxCanada @ecojustice_ca @WCELaw @CanEnvLawAssn @envirodefence @IBA_Canada #cdnpoli


Covid recovery money is going to the oligarchy.

Ottawa and the provinces have put very little on the table to help clean-tech companies directly during Covid 19 while targeting fossil-fuel producers with more than $16 billion in aid.

Coast to coast people have demanded treaties be honored. We demanded climate action, divestment and land back but Canada is not listening. This video shows 10 years of rallies in Waterloo Ontario. City & regional council declared a climate emergency. 🚨

The Bank of China (BOC), SNC-Lavalin and WE Charity were recipients of taxpayer-funded the Covid 19 Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS)

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.