With increasing domestic pressure and indisputable evidence provided by internationally accredited experts, the Government has now appointed a new 11 member expert committee on 24.12.2020 comprised of reputed virologists and qualified experts. (1)

The stated position which has been disclosed repeatedly by the President, PM & Health Minister since the beginning of COVID-19 regarding permitting burials is to “go with the recommendations of the experts”. (2)
Similarly, the stance of the Muslim community since the very beginning has been that IF science proves that burial is harmful, THEN we will cease our claims immediately, as we do not wish to cause harm to anyone.

This has been conveyed to to all officials and the public. (3)
Over the last 10 months, science has proven overwhelmingly that in 194 countries and at least 1.5 million COVID-19 burials worldwide, there is no tangible evidence that burial is harmful. (4)
The formation of this new expert committee is due to the fact that it has now been proven overwhelmingly that the previous committee’s recommendations are disputed and were based largely on “unknowns”, with lack of substantial evidence to prove or disprove its recommendations.(5)
Such recommendations were also not available in the public domain for the aggrieved Muslim community to consume.

If such information was valid, then it should have been made available so that we can accept it & agree with the stance of the Government. Nothing was provided. (6)
Now, I place my full confidence in science and in the reputation of the members of this new committee.

I also place confidence in the fact that the President, PM & Health Minister have stated repeatedly that they will act in accordance to the recommendations of the experts.(7)
I’d like to believe that this new committee’s findings is based purely on SCIENCE and supplemented by the recommendations provided by international organizations & experts who have ruled clearly that burial does not create a risk to contaminate groundwater or spread COVID-19. (8)
Their report is now completed and is due to be presented on 30.12.2020 to the President via the Health Ministry.

I sincerely hope it will be presented in its full form, without any last-minute changes or deletions. (9)
As such, I only ask that the President, Prime Minister and Health Minister act as promised, with the recommendations of the new expert committee, and pass the requisite legislation in keeping with this report by this new committee. (10)
I also request this report be made available to the public via the Health Ministry or Presidential Secretariat after its submission.

I ask this on behalf of my entire distressed community to give us solace, and on behalf of those aggrieved families, to give them closure.(11)
Moreover, this will largely assist in assuaging the prevailing distrust and fear between affected communities and the authorities, which will greatly contribute towards COVID-19 mitigation and controlling the spread throughout Sri Lanka. We can fight this together! (12)
I place my trust and faith that after an exhausting, grueling, heartbreaking 10 months of struggling for basic human rights, science and humanity will finally prevail. God Willing. (13)

#StopForcedCremations

More from Government

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.

Always. No, your company is not an exception.

A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.

Listen to Aditya


And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.

I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.

You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.

Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]