THREAD: Enemy Combatants

1. There is a preponderance of evidence that the C C P were involved influencing the outcome of the US 2020 election. The details are available to those who wish to look.

I cannot be convinced that the Military didn’t watch all of this, in real time.

2. I cannot be convinced that DNI Ratcliffe isn’t investigating this matter exactly as per the 2018 Executive Order on Foreign Interference in an election.

https://t.co/zsANAInmck

I cannot be convinced that Biden will ever get a security clearance, even as a visitor to the WH.
3. The eyes of the world are now on the US Military and the Supreme Court (SC).

People are talking of war, cyber-terr0rism, treas0n, Chynese Military troops in Canada and US Naval ships off the coast lines.

Remain calm.

A counter-insurgency must involve the nation's citizens.
4. The importance of US Military law and the role of the SC reminded of that intriguing (almost scripted) interview between Sen. Lindsay Graham and SC Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing.

[Link at end of thread].
5. Firstly, Graham invoked the heartstrings by reminding everyone of the 9/11 tragedy AND then got Kavanaugh to confirm that the US was still legally at war, due the Authorization for Use of Military Force resolution of 2001.

https://t.co/HbcnX6Ofco
6. He then zeroed in on ‘The Law of Armed Conflict’ and when a US citizen becomes and Enemy Combatant.

This was long established in Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).

I found it strange that Kavanaugh was so well-versed on such obscure detail,
7. without [possibly] knowing that the question was going to be asked.

He also noted that US citizens who collaborated with foreign forces can be tried by the Military and in a couple of cases, they were executed!

This was established by Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
8. The theatre between Lindsay Graham and Kavanaugh confirmed a well-developed body of law that confirms that the US Constitution provides no protection to US citizens, if they are collaborating with a foreign enemy.

Here we are at the 2020 election!
9. I have no idea whether the jurisdiction of the SC and the Military will overlap here, but I do know that Judge Kavanaugh knows exactly what is going on.

Also remember - we are still in the calm ‘before’ the storm!

Link to Kavanaugh interview:
https://t.co/brJDRDhdbj

/END/
10. https://t.co/IEAAvSvgCt

More from Spies Like Us

THREAD: Original Trusts

1. Just for a moment, ponder:

- Does anyone own humanity?
- Does anyone 'think' they own humanity?
- Can a corporation own you, or just control you?
- What are ancient Trusts and who owned them?
- Do ancient Trusts still hold any authority in society?

2. Trusts and Corporations have woven a form of control around the earth and we are just now realizing their influence on society.

Let's explore how this may have occurred.

The earliest Trusts were not legal entities as they are today; they were powerful ‘statements of claim’.

3. They were known as Express Trusts.

These Trust required very little formality and could even be enacted orally, as proclamations.

They were most-commonly used for property transfers.

https://t.co/0O3m2xvxjM


4. The first Express Trust was Unam Sanctam decreed in 1302.

With some egotistical distortions of biblical writing, this Trust effectively made Pope Boniface King of the World, believing that “every human creature” was now subject to the authority of the Pope (Item #9).


5. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated head-dress in the shape of a pine cone, with an elaborate crown at its base.

Note carefully, that it was the “growing body of canon law” (judges) that began to give the Pope his authority; both temporal (worldly) and spiritual.

More from Government

You May Also Like

THIS.

Russia hasn't been a willing partner in this treaty for almost 3 decades. We should have ended the pretense long ago.

Naturally, Rand Paul is telling anyone who will listen to him that Trump is making a HUGE MISTAKE here.


Rand is just like his dad, Ron. 100% isolationist.

They've never grasped that 100% isolationist is not 'America First' when you examine it. It really means 'America Alone'.

The consistent grousing of pursuing military alliances with allies - like Trump is doing now with Saudi Arabia.

So of course Rand has also spent the last 2 days loudly calling for Trump to kill the arms deal with Saudi Arabia and end our alliance with them.

What Obama was engineering with his foreign policy was de facto isolationism: pull all the troops out of the ME, abandon the region to Iranian control as a client state of Russia.

Obama wasn't building an alliance with Iran; he was facilitating abandoning the ME to Iran.

Obama wouldn't even leave behind a token security force, so of course what happened was the rise of ISIS. He also pumped billions of dollars into the Iranian coffers, which the Mullah's used to fund destabilizing activity [wars/terrorism] & criminal enterprises all over the globe