This is exactly what the UK Government does to unpaid carers -IF you are fortunate to have time to have another job (because you're not caring 24/7) they take your income support or UC pound for pound for every pound you earn. Once that's all gone they take your carers allowance.

So in other words - IF you are fortunate enough to have time to take a job - you end up doing two jobs for half the money. So what you end up with is most full time carers being locked-in to the caring roll earning less than £2.30 an hour.
2020 has been a lesson that the UK population doesn't give a crap about carers, or low income families. Sure, they'll stand on their doorsteps and clap, or abuse their neighbour who didn't clap, but the reality is that it serves the British state to keep low income carers...
...and unpaid carers in forced servitude (and that's exactly what it is). When it broke that people were being forced to work for £3, 4, 5 per hour in sweat shops in northern England at the start of the pandemic, you couldn't turn on a TV channel without some politician...
...talking about "worker exploitation", but the reality is that the UK is ok with worker exploitation. It has engaged in it for decades through both Labour and Tory governments. It actually has legislation that specifically defines Carers Allowance as an allowance...
...rather than a benefit - because it being even a benefit would mean the Government had certain responsibilities to carers.

The average carer gets £114 per week and most work more than 60 hours per week.
There are 2 million full time and 6 million part time carers. Pre-Covid they saved the UK Government £136Billion per year. During this pandemic where public services have laid their responsibilities at the feet of unpaid carers....
...who by the way have absolutely no employment rights - that £136 billion was surpassed in 7 months of this year. Meaning that this year carers in the UK are on target to save the public purse over £210 Bn.
Putting that in perspective for you, that's the equivelant of the budgets for England, Scotland, Northern and Northern Ireland COMBINED.
I could put out 1000 tweets about carers and i'd be lucky to get 20 retweets about it. Put out a funny cat meme and i'd get 1000. The truth is that this " Britishness" that they try to sell as community spirit, it actually isn't.
The reality is that the UK is a place where the nimby's are in charge and forced servitude and worker exploitation are OK when hidden from site. Carers are dismissed as "having chosen to give up work" when in reality, most don't have a choice at all.
The reason they don't have a choice is because the system is designed to deprive them of that choice, and then to deprive them of a voice in telling the world they had no choice.
With politicians the words "We love carers" are usually followed by "they give up work". The reality is that they have given up nothing. Caring IS THEIR WORK. What they give up through no choice of their own, is their workers rights compared to their private and public sector...
....counterparts.

So I am not the least bit surprised the tories are doing this to those who are "allowed" to be classified as workers - not one bit!

https://t.co/rckHsogHaI

More from Government

I am going to take the context for this thread from this piece by my good brother @mabziz in 2018-3 years ago. One thing I am so perturbed about is the response of our Attorney General's office to issues of state security. I have no personal grouse against @MalamiSan, but


2. I do have a professional grouse against him. I feel he is not alive to his duties. I feel that he is also not empowering his Director of Public Prosecutions or his Solicitor General. There is clearly a lot that befuddles me and this is because I am a seasoned lawyer and can't/

3. understand why law is not being used as the instrument it was designed for-to enforce law and order. Let us take the case of Nnamdi Kanu-this man was arraigned in Nigeria on a charge of treason/treasonable felony-he was on bail & he jumped bail. Why has he not been extradited?

4. Is it that Kanu is somehow bigger than Nigeria? What has happened to his surety who failed to produce him? Who is prosecuting him? Our Federal Ministry of Justice? Should Malami not explain to Nigeria why Nnamdi Kanu is still taunting Nigeria daily & still actively destroying/

5. our unity everyday. He is putting the lives of many people at risk and stoking ethnic dissent easily. The Fulani herdsmen dilemma, the burning of Lagos State and his coordination of same on phone-in radio channels, his videos are all stoking a Yoruba/Igbo carnage. Same with/

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.