Muthoot finance vs Manapurram Finance: Deep value opportunities?
Link to the blog🔗:https://t.co/MMQVfbRGuZ
By- @badola_arjun
-Gold Loan Business
-Diversification or Diworsification?
-Comparison between both
-Sources of risks
More from Intrinsic Compounding
Sequent will teach many people about what Hyperbolic Discounting and Myopic Loss aversion means. 2 Mental models which an equity investor has to understand about. No other way. Disc: invested, not a reco
Having multiple facilities accredited with certifications from the best authorities from globe is a hidden moat in itself... 10-20% pop and then retracement should not shake confidence... Business focus and longevity should build conviction
— Harinder S Nanda (@harindersnanda) July 14, 2021
\U0001f436\U0001f431\U0001f434\U0001f42e\U0001f437\U0001f411@unseenvalue @soicfinance
More from Gold
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
