If you’ve donated to @BorahaeFunds, I would suggest disputing with your bank account in hopes to get your money back and defund them. The amount of money they have... it’s a scam at this point if they’re going against donors/@BTS_twt wishes of funding Life Goes On.

I was in a group chat with one of the admins who was really rude and aggressive when I asked about donations when they first appeared.
Their original statement was “we will not be receiving funds. We have our own private funds to fund Armys” & their account was originally only suppose to track funds. Others in the chat questioned them & even stated that it was misleading if it was only meant to track funds.
Their account within the first weeks was deleted and then reappeared again. And then, within weeks they started accepting funds. That already seemed suspicious to me. But I gave them the benefit of the doubt when they kept their word and funded Armys despite those inconsistencies
Lately, however, they’ve been inconsistent and lying about their intentions with other peoples money. Not your own money. This changes things. That is a scam @BorahaeFunds .
Screenshots about when I personally told people to proceed with caution
https://t.co/Fysac5EdOc
https://t.co/oy6a8l3SX7
https://t.co/No8FMkkxsk
Again, they did gain my trust with time because they were funding Armys but if you’re taking others people’s money and not following through with what you originally promised was the plan, you are a scammer.

More from Fraud

A thread on attempted election fraud in Canada: First, most breaches of election law here are related to financing, not illegal voting or ballot-box stuffing. And most are minor. That’s because our elxn finance laws are extremely tight and contribution/spending limits low. 1/


I covered two of the best-known cases in recent years: “robocalls” in 2011 election and the “in-and-out” affair of 2006. You probably heard a lot about the former and maybe nothing of the latter. Both were important for different reasons. 2/

In robocalls, the Conservative party’s voter-tracking database, CIMS, was used to make fraudulent automated calls to about 7,000 identified Liberal voters in Guelph, Ontario, directing them to the wrong polling location. The scheme didn’t work. The Liberals won the riding. 3/

Elections Canada caught on to the scheme on the day the calls were made, election day, and began investigating almost immediately. The long and complex investigation found the calls originated with someone working for the Conservative candidate in Guelph. 4/

After a trial, a lone campaign staffer was found guilty. He served jail time. The judge said it appeared to him others were likely involved but no one else was charged. Throughout, the CPC denied any knowledge of the scheme. 5/
https://t.co/tsTubhXYFM
2018
"Bribery and corruption in the NHS ‘being underreported"
The NHSCFA calculated that fraud costs the NHS £1.29bn each year, in its annual report and accounts – enough to pay for more than 40,000 staff nurses or to buy 5,000 ambulances."


1.


2.


3.


https://t.co/YPfXciseV0
4.

2017

You May Also Like