Categories For later read

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
👀‼️Remember as a kid, your parents used to talk in code around you so wouldn’t know what they were really talking about? Do you remember when it was really hot because of the forest fires and DJT said that it was actually going to get really cold?


What if the is the climatic year of all Corona themes, only we didn’t know about the most important one because they didn’t want us to worry and had it handled?

Keywords, first image, top of page: geomagnetic polarity, bottom of page, things cooling.


Look at the current, the satellites and the towers.


Note the words “coronal” and “magnetic”.


Remember all this mix up over Covfefe?
This is what happens when you train neural networks largely on tone and its stylistic relics. They pick up formal features of arguments (not so much fallacies as tics) that have almost nothing to do with semantic content (focus on connotation over implication).


This is a secular problem in the discipline. It's got nothing to do with the Analytic/Continental split in the anglophone world. They've both got the same ramifying signal/noise problem, it's just that the styles (tics and connotations) are different in each pedagogical context.

And this is before we start talking about tone policing and topic policing, which are both rife and essentially make the peer review journal system completely unfit for purpose, populated as it is by a random sampling of pedants selecting for syntactic noise over semantic signal.

We've allowed a system of self-reinforcing and ratcheting filters to evolve that effectively *fuzzes* our contribution to the growth of human knowledge (https://t.co/VmW15pGt7J), because it selects for properties only loosely related to those we claim to want. Let that sink in.

This is literally the opposite of what a filter is supposed to do: extract signal from noise, syntactic compression that preserves semantic content. Instead we are awash in syntactic artifacts optimised for minimal criticisable content and maximal pedantic posturing.
Here the big people you requested. Now delete your tweets:

1. Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “I asked my Shaikh Siraaj ud deen al-Balqayaanee about Ibn Arabee and he replied quickly he is kaafir (disbeliever)”{Leesaan ul-Meezaan(4/319), another edn (5/213),


…Tambiyyatul-Ghabee Ilaa Takfeer Ibn Arabee (pg.159)}

2. Muhaddith Baqaa’ee wrote our teacher Haafidh Ibn Hajr and another man called Ibn al-Ameen had a mubaahilah concerning Ibn Arabee. The man said, “If Ibn Arabee is upon misguidance then curse me.”

Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “Oh Allaah if Ibn Arabee is upon guidance then curse me.” After a few months the man became blind and died during the night.
{Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.136-137)}

3. Haafidh Ibn Daqeeq al-Eed asked Abu Muhammad Izz ud deen Abdul Azeez bin Abdus Salaam as-Silmee ad-Damashqee (660H) about Ibn Arabee and he replied, “Dirty, liar and far from the truth, he opined time was old and he did not consider other peoples private parts to be…

…haraam.”
{al-Wafaa Bal-Wafyaat (4/125) with an authentic chain, Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.138)}
Our institutions are failing.

You need a strong network to survive.

The #LiminalOrder is the fastest growing all men's network in the country.

Are you ready to become happier, healthier, + wealthier?

Tomorrow is your chance.

Step 1: join the list.

https://t.co/IFoLVqX2DA


https://t.co/4o6lnZysrV


https://t.co/Ew8NjeoHSe


https://t.co/LlXGZFjhF9


https://t.co/ZTPLkpdgFg