1/ Here's the case for making "Curate" the first step in my methodology for personal knowledge management, known as CODE. Instead of "Capture"

C – Curate
O – Organize
D – Distill
E – Express

2/ The word "Capture" comes from the first step of GTD, which described it as "the Capture Habit"

This was a novel idea at the time, that you could pluck bits of information out of your mind and the external world and save it in a place you trust and control
3/ When it comes to open loops (unfinished tasks), it's very important to capture them:

1) from your internal mind (where they cause stress)
2) immediately (before you forget them)
3) thoroughly (because even a single one slipping through the cracks can be catastrophic)
4/ But none of these apply to capturing non-actionable information. Most of it 1) comes from the outside world, 2) will come around again if it's any good, and 3) you have to be VERY selective about what you keep to avoid getting drowned in it
5/ And most clearly of all, you don't want the act of capturing content to be habitual and automatic. Habits are best for actions that require no active thought, and may actually suffer if you think about them too much
6/ Capturing content, in contrast, should be as intentional and strategic as possible. It should be mindful, not mindless. This adds friction, but that's a good thing: you don't want anything going into your first OR second brain unfiltered
7/ "Capturing" also emphasizes the mechanical action – taking out a notepad or app, opening it, writing out the open loop, hitting save...

It suggests that if you don't capture something, it will escape, and that will be a bad thing
8/ But with content, capturing can be completely or partially automated (with Readwise, IFTTT, Zapier, native integrations) or easily postponed for later (save to Instapaper, Pocket)

And if you don't get to it later, that's a good thing. The good stuff always comes back around
9/ "Curation" has a very different connotation. It's more about the mindset of being very picky, using your intuition and taste to choose only the best, and having high standards for what is allowed to take up your attention
10/ To curate is to choose an item not in isolation, but as part of a broader collection, theme, or purpose. Like a museum curator choosing artwork for an exhibition, or a magazine editor choosing photos for a spread
11/ Curation also implies that the curator is adding a lot of value, not just gathering together any old stuff. Which is also true in content consumption: what you choose to consume is itself a creative and strategic act, from which everything else flows
12/ "Content curation" has been a niche trend for bloggers, influencers, social media accounts, & marketplaces. But now all of us have to curate info for ourselves. We can't trust that algorithmic feeds will serve our interests. Even social media posts from friends are suspect
13/ Instead of The Capture Habit, I propose The Curation Mindset – a general attitude toward the world that assumes there is a lot of noise and misinformation out there, and we have to purposefully find the signal in the noise
14/ This applies to personal knowledge management of course, but also far beyond. It's bringing mindfulness and intentionality to our info consumption habits, which we are learning can shape our most deeply held beliefs and attitudes

More from For later read

Hi @EdinburghUni @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk

The DIVERSITY INFORMATION section in yr job application mentions 'legal equality duties'. You then ask "What is your gender identity?" with options

Female
Male
Non-binary
Not-listed
Other

1/13


'Gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

2/13


Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology - 'non-binary' and 'other' are not valid options.

https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF

'Gender identity' is not a synonym for sex.

3/13


You then ask "Does your gender identity match your sex registered at birth?"

4/13


Again, 'gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

5/13
The #worldwildlifeday2021 theme is Forests and Livelihoods: Sustaining People and Planet aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goals 1, 12, 13 and 15. So, what are the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) & how can children begin to learn about them & get involved ?

https://t.co/8ICvHxE9QL is easy & fun to follow for our smallest of people #EYFS. Early childhood is the perfect stage to introduce the core concepts of what it means to be a global citizen. For our reception & KS1 children please take a look at this fabulous free resource

https://t.co/tZx8UIS58Q Storytelling is a powerful communications tool and helps children remember lessons and virtues that they will use in everyday life. The idea is to simplify the lessons of the (SDGs) so young children can relate to – and better understand – the SDGs.

For older children here’s a board game that aims to help teach children around the world about the Sustainable Development Goals in a simple and child-friendly way

This is a lovely free book for children to enjoy flicking through themselves https://t.co/ScMbQCfpjl Elyx, the United Nations’ digital ambassador, uses various expressions and actions to help demonstrate the meaning of each Sustainable Development Goal.
There is some valuable analysis in this report, but on the defense front this report is deeply flawed. There are other sections of value in report but, candidly, I don't think it helps us think through critical question of Taiwan defense issues in clear & well-grounded way. 1/


Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/

BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/

The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/

Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/

You May Also Like