A few days ago @mrjamesob asked me if I felt vindicated bc I’ve been saying for years that they’re fascists. And I realized when I woke up this morning the answer is: I feel angry. Furious. We warned people, using historical evidence, of what was happening.

After the 9/11 attacks, airlines and public buildings adopted a flurry of "security" measures, like taking away pen-knives from fliers or requiring visitors to office buildings to be photographed or present a driver's license.

1/

Bruce Schneier's seminal 2003 "Beyond Fear" called these measures: #securitytheater.

Schneier pointed out that these measures would be easy to circumvent, and were thus providing only the comforting appearance of security - not security

Security theater is worse than nothing. Security theater gives people the false impression that their risks have been mitigated, when actually things are just as dangerous.

After al, if you know that danger exists, you can take some steps to mitigate or avoid it.

3/

But if you have the false impression that you've been made safer, you might unwittingly engage in risky behavior.

4/

Like, if you know your car's brakes are flaky, you might nurse the car along to the mechanic at low speed on side-streets.

But if you don't know about the brakes, you're apt to discover their flaws at 75mph on the freeway.

5/

6th SUNDAY SPECIAL #ShoutOut

Hard Core Right Wingers

Step 1-Retweet ALL Lists

Step 2-Follow ALL 289 Handles in ALL 17 Lists

Step 3-Honestly FOLLOW BACK the ONEs who follow u

Earlier Lists welcome for Multiplying

सब जुड़ जाओ, एक हो जाओ

RW को फ़ौलाद💪बना दो

#HinduEcosystem

List 1

@FltLtAnoopVerma
@mickeyanoop
@Bharatiyasatyam
@ModIfiedAksHIT
@AshishMakhijani
@AbePappi
@Neh_hope_faith
@VenkateshBung
@IndianSarthak01
@iMuditJain
@ShravanBJYM
@DrxPragya
@isinghDeepanshu
@suyashdeep
@SuyashJ09
@TusharKant_Naik
@arunkdimpu
@Coachketang

#HinduEcosystem

List 2

@thisissAnjaliG
@Naiktanmay111
@NikhilChelsea12
@IvaSaina
@neil_sane
@aarti162004
@AppamWidUndhiyu
@The_NitinD
@Nitin_vn46
@NikhilBhamre8
@C_JackMH26
@SimzAU
@Impregnable007
@Manika_0315
@BhatiaCrish
@LibtardsKaDoc
@Horse_stable13
@oldschoolmonk1
@Anu_2208
#HinduEcosystem

List 3

@Aartitva
@TraderChirag
@ibonthewayindia
@RubishRaja
@NidarAryan
@doubtfulLucifer
@pandey_kill_bil
@PrathamShashank
@SanataniMarwadi
@DubeyYash1911
@bayonetwarrior
@satyamev21
@parasadukia
@Sanghi_wrath
@hritwik_paul
@just_bhakt
@ss_aarthi
@JRamlingam

#HinduEcosystem

List 4

@UshaNirmala
@Ajusan123
@Nayak1812
@Ayush_Shah_25
@shakti050
@kunaljain_19
@HashtagAviral
@abhi_rocks1004
@sanghini_
@GouriBhide
@KhamanDhokIa
@Shreyas54125712
@Shreya1176
@shubham_ag7
@proudsanghii
@sanghialien
@_Sanghi_Saffron
@saffronpride_
@BHARTIYFOJI
#HinduEcosystem

@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa That's a good qsn, if not a bit nuanced. Avataras are of many varieties and frankly, most of the classification is only for our understanding and not really binding on Paramatma Himself. We can take several approaches to understanding this. If you go by a Vedantic approach,+

@GunduHuDuGa Avatara means that which descends from an exalted state (Taara). Going by Upanishadic observaton of Purnam adham purnam idham, every manifestation of Bhagavan is indeed wholesome. In fact, Avataras usually happen when Iswara is propitiated with certain qualities already+

@GunduHuDuGa described in the Vedas by other Devatas. So, in order to please them, He assumes the form that best envisages the said Vaidika tatvam. For example, Varaha and Nrusimha avatars, though they have sthoola prayojanas, also exemplify the Tejovanna tatvam propounded by Upanishads.+

@GunduHuDuGa All these tatvams ultimately emanate from Him so whatever form He takes is indeed Purna. Now, one may ask then if that's the case, why such a distinction had to be made in the first place. That is because of upasana vidhis and understanding of how Bhagavad tatvam shines+

@GunduHuDuGa with each Leela being performed. Let's take Nrusimha avatar. The purpose of the avatar is neither to save Hiranyakasipu nor rescue Prahlada. For that He need not descend down as H's boons are applicable only for Brahman's creation and not Paramatma Himself.+

Some familiar figures are pushing the absurd and defamatory claim that Ken Loach supports Holocaust denial. The story of this bogus talking-point, which relies upon multiple layers of falsehood and guilt-by-association, makes for a revealing case-study. 1/

It dates back to the 2017 Labour conference. In a NYT op-ed, Howard Jacobson claimed that “a motion to question the truth of the Holocaust was proposed” from the conference floor—a crude fabrication, which the NYT sanctioned in its pages. 2/

If you follow the link supplied by Jacobson or his editors, you’ll see that he was wrong on 3 counts: it wasn’t a motion, it wasn’t at the conference, and it wasn’t in favour of Holocaust denial. Quite the hat-trick! 3/

At a fringe meeting, granted no official status by Labour, an Israeli-Jewish speaker, Miko Peled, had said that he didn’t think Holocaust denial should be a criminal offense (which it is in some European countries). 4/

This is a perfectly reasonable position to hold—that opinions, no matter how wrong-headed or morally objectionable, should not be a matter for the criminal law—and of course it does not mean that Peled himself questions the truth of the Holocaust. 5/