*puts on hard hat, respirator, asbestos gloves* (hey i haven't used these in awhile!)
okay. i'm seeing the same claims on my TL over & over that quite frankly, make no sense. & now they're starting to broken-telephone into each other so:
my thoughts on vaccine schedule.
but say just that. we know this works, we don't know about other regimes.
primary seroconversion takes about 2 weeks (that's why the attack rate in the trials was still high then, then fell off a cliff).
as an aside, a few things that i keep hearing that further make no sense:
it means that if 100 of you sign up for Tai-Tai's Cluster Dancing Lessons (so fresh you're guaranteed to go viral!), only 5 (or 30) of you will contract #COVIDー19 after attending.
none of this is new, we've studied this extensively for MMR: https://t.co/zRf61T1qcO
i stand by this claim, even more strongly than before: https://t.co/5YlJNPGmLO
here's a hot take: a reason, & a very important one *FOR* running a 1 dose vs. 2 dose vaccine RCT is *because* some people will miss the second dose. it will happen.
— Jasnah Kholin - ACAB (@wanderer_jasnah) December 18, 2020
people forget.
gov'ts fuck up, under-order, fuck up distribution.
supply chains can break down.
we can yell at each other over what is optimal until we are blue in the face & we all hate each other for no reason, or...
to say nothing of countries that can only afford 1 dose/person this year.
some references: https://t.co/muK3HQdgJ6 / https://t.co/muK3HQdgJ6 / https://t.co/4K4Bafimvm / https://t.co/RdckhYyksv / https://t.co/bV2We9NFN8
More from For later read
And yet authoritarians often broadcast silly, unpersuasive propaganda.
Political scientist Haifeng Huang writes that the purpose of propaganda is not to brainwash people, but to instill fear in them /2
"propaganda is often not used for indoctrination, but rather to signal the government\u2019s strength in being able to afford significant resources and impose on its citizens...not meant to 'brainwash', but rather to forewarn the society about how strong it is" https://t.co/mFAurhEHeO pic.twitter.com/WXKKJaPqWQ
— Rob Henderson (@robkhenderson) June 18, 2020
When people are bombarded with propaganda everywhere they look, they are reminded of the strength of the regime.
The vast amount of resources authoritarians spend to display their message in every corner of the public square is a costly demonstration of their power /3
In fact, the overt silliness of authoritarian propaganda is part of the point. Propaganda is designed to be silly so that people can instantly recognize it when they see it
Authoritarians do not use propaganda for brainwashing, "but to demonstrate their strength in social control...propaganda may need to be dull and unpersuasive, to make sure citizens know it is propaganda when they see it and hence get the implicit message" https://t.co/PqRpxjaIPL pic.twitter.com/1y67d2RCjB
— Rob Henderson (@robkhenderson) June 19, 2020
Propaganda is intended to instill fear in people, not brainwash them.
The message is: You might not believe in pro-regime values or attitudes. But we will make sure you are too frightened to do anything about it.
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.