I'd love to think that @michaelsheen's thoughts and responses to Welsh nationhood are the start of a new wave of discussion surrounding who, what, why and how of Welsh Independence.

As support and engagement for #IndyWales increases and the integrity of "Britain" spirals out of control to its inevitable demise, so does the argument against it which more often than not a wave of regurgitated clichés that we must endure.
In turn we have to be careful about this ourselves. We cannot repeat the same rhetoric without evolving our point. And let's be honest Welsh Independence is a good enough point as it is but what can we do to bring those into the fold?
There's plenty of things we can do. Discussion is a key point. It'e tiring for me when I'm the butt of jokes in work for supporting IndyWales and starting a business that's based on it. Yet the arguments by these people are always the same; too poor, too small, too dumb. Boring.
Centuries of misrule, subservience, servitude and asset stripping have led this country and all those within its borders to suffer. And suffer as a whole we have. our shared history with England is a hard one, filled with
Can we do better as a country to build a better future? Of course we bloody can & it'll be on our own terms. We will have to do better as a nation & as a people to undo the negativity that not just the British state has done but what we have also done willingly. Reboot & renew.
As Andrew Nutt wrote in the Western Mail & correctly so we should be the ones making the decisions, right or wrong, good or bad. Our successes are ours and so should our failures. Not a nation that's seen as another property and plaything. Let us be the driver of our own destiny.
The small number of prominent Welsh celebrities and notable figures that have come out in support or leaned into being indy confident is growing. Who will be the next? I'll be happy if anyone from the "mainstream" public eye opens up about being for Independence.
We all have an idea of what Welsh Independence should be, what it means to us and what it can be. But if we can engage just one person about the benefits of an independent Wales and why it should happen that's one more person and we've achieved something.
This is "Generation Indy". It's about building an independent Wales not just for the now but for future generations. It's about so many things but most importantly an independent Wales needs, must & deserves to have its own say on the worlds stage.
We have yet to have what Scotland dubbed their "Braveheart" moment or have we? Rather than it be one piece of media that stirred the spirits of a country. Is ours the feet on the ground marching for independence, is ours the people behind & in each indy group? Sure as hell is.
We may have to wait for our braveheart, our "Glyndŵr Rising", but even if it doesn't come. We have momentum on our side. We have the knowledge that being under the control of another nation isn't right now as it wasn't right then.
Certain characters of ill repute in the Tory party have made note that they are happy that the words of the @fmwales effectively hold no sway & fall on deaf ears with @10DowningStreet. What a vile little sentiment to hold onto. To be happy that the voice of a nation is silenced.
I can ramble on about dreams and hopes but we have to reinforce this at the ballot box in 2021. It's one part of heading towards making all we campaign for, all we talk to people about a reality.
And I think that's why having such a positive name like Michael Sheen talk about the relationship between 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 & 🇬🇧 as a whole is welcoming. But it's up to all of us to really make our own voices count. Do not go gentle into that night. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Welsh independence is for everyone.

More from For later read

This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.