![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2VKhUcAIcXAU.jpg)
Gematria decode ... very powerful and a bit moving too, at the end ... https://t.co/D6s7zEev80
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqY2UkVVgAEFa2z.jpg)
\U0001f4a5INdiGO ASCenSiON\U0001f4a5..........................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 29, 2020
\U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5..................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/dW24cc8ruv
More from 🌹⚜️ ⚔️ 𝒮𝒽𝑒𝓀𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒽 ⚔️ ⚜️ 🌹
At the moment, POTUS is sitting on a stack of Trump cards that he's just waiting to unleash...a royal flush!
@John_F_Kennnedy @Pamelal33566076 @GeorgePapa19 @whitebunny @atvguy @stormis_us
This is the Calm...in the Eye of the Storm. pic.twitter.com/Zl7D48TAlf
— AltarOfEgo (@unidentifiedta1) December 31, 2020
He has court cases that will go to the Supreme Court and thanks to the Texas case, he's now aware how to file them properly... under article 3 not 2...
so the SCOTUS will be forced to listen.....He now has the DNI report. Barr stepped down and can now be a witness.....he did his job. Durham is special counsel and can prosecute, in any state....
He’s letting civil, criminal, and federal courts fail to handle the situation properly.....so he can use military tribunals. He has ALL the data from the NSA, the Kraken supercomputer, the Alice supercomputer and likely many more computers, unknown to us....
He has the dueling electors from 7 state legislatures. He has VP Pence, as the final arbiter of which ballots to accept.. the NDAA, the national emergency, the 14th amendment, the 2018 executive order, the 2017 very first EO, the Patriot Act, the FISA warrants,
Divine!! pic.twitter.com/85eQjQsBMG
— \U0001f339\u269c\ufe0f \u2694\ufe0f \U0001d4ae\U0001d4bd\U0001d452\U0001d4c0\U0001d4bd\U0001d4be\U0001d4c3\U0001d4b6\U0001d4bd \u2694\ufe0f \u269c\ufe0f \U0001f339 (@PetahJane) January 2, 2021
He is!!
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEWPhVEAAg8YC.jpg)
Trust the plan!!
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEW1NU0AYLWmp.jpg)
https://t.co/8TW43LNdJo
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEXYIUwAA3mBR.jpg)
https://t.co/Ee6Iddislv
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqvEX56UcAEUpKQ.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video_thumb/EpH2ZLrVgAMmvXZ.jpg)
\U0001f4a5ViCToRy\U0001f4a5iS OuRS \U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 13, 2020
\U0001f4a5..............................................................................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/r8L32gnZmh
https://t.co/LEY7ZuSj0i
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpH2aLiUcAANyLL.jpg)
https://t.co/aFNhQhVP6Q
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpH2a4OUcAARizj.jpg)
https://t.co/9Ai0QXAIcg
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpH2bayVgAM8noY.jpg)
https://t.co/ekTV5auW6s
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpH2cKOUwAImqAD.jpg)
More from For later read
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5bpvjXQAEMxB1.jpg)
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5cWdfXQAA501l.jpg)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5dUCgWwAAqUSL.jpg)
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?