But, the proposal does not.
1/ The “No Surprises Act” is deeply flawed. It should not advance in its current form. Work must continue to reach a meaningful remedy to “surprise medical bills” #SMB that keeps patients out of the middle and provides balance.
Here are several concerns w/ the current proposal:
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
But, the proposal does not.
•Further narrow networks
•Limit access to care for patients
•Jeopardize health equity, and
•Put at risk healthcare jobs for employees
This has direct and indirect economic impacts.
•narrow networks
•high deductibles with disproportionate cost sharing
•take-it-or-leave-it contracts spurred by market dominance
It rewards insurers reaping record profits.
Esp. now is not the time to rush a flawed SMB proposal.
\U0001f449\u201d@PAMEDSociety\u2069 strongly urges #Congress to go back to the drawing board and put together a more balanced #surprisebilling proposal \u2013 one that does not diminish the essential role physicians play in delivering life-saving treatments.\u201d \u203c\ufe0f #SMB https://t.co/jzSyGyaBSu pic.twitter.com/lajXyUzagR
— Marilyn Heine (@MarilynHeineMD) December 16, 2020
https://t.co/6vAd9I5VRs
AMA on #SMB proposal https://t.co/5YyzAv6rzY
— Marilyn Heine (@MarilynHeineMD) December 16, 2020
\u201c...we oppose enactment of the bill in its current form...\u201d
\u201c...we urge you to allow additional time for \u2066@AmerMedicalAssn\u2069 & other stakeholders to work with you to address our concerns & come up with a more balanced solution.\u201d pic.twitter.com/5PAZrvJf09
More from For later read
There\u2019s this crazy horseshoe where where having a strong emphasis on human sinfulness just turns into a power washer that blasts all harm and wrong-doing down to the same level of things people (re: men) inevitably do given half a chance. https://t.co/BLOWzpf1RA
— Laura Robinson (@LauraRbnsn) February 13, 2021
On the one hand, there's a high standard of holiness. On the other hand, there's a model of growth that is basically "Try Harder to Mean it More." Identify the relevant scriptural truth & believe it with all of your sincerity so that you may access the Holy Spirit's help to obey.
Helping sincere believers believe and obey the Bible facts is pretty much all the Holy Spirit does these days, other than convict us of our sins in light of the Bible facts.
If you know you are sincere and hate your sin and believe the right Bible facts as hard as you can but continue to be enslaved to your pornography addiction, what else left for you to do? Just Really, Just Really, Just Really Trust God and Give it to Him?
To suggest that there are other strategies available sounds to those formed in this model of growth like one is also suggesting that the Bible is insufficient, but it also suggests something just as threatening- that there are aspects of reality that are not immediately apparent.
How do I know they have NDAs, if they can't talk legally about them? Because they trusted me with their secrets... after I said something. That's how they knew I was safe.
And if the environment at the org was toxic or abusive, it is not uncommon to not realize the extent of that toxicity/abuse until after you're out. But by the time you realize that you signed under duress and presumed good faith where none existed, you're out of options.
— Lauren Thoman (@LaurenThoman) February 16, 2021
Some of the people who have reached out to me privately have been sitting with the pain of what happened to them and the regret that they signed for YEARS. But at the time, it didn't seem like they had any other option BUT to sign.
I do not blame *anyone* for signing an NDA, especially when it's attached to a financial lifeline. When you feel like your family's wellbeing is at stake, you'll do anything -- even sign away your own voice -- to provide for them. That's not a "choice"; that's survival.
And yes, many of the people whose stories I now know were pressured into signing an NDA by my husband's ex-employer. Some of whom I *never* would have guessed. People I thought "left well." Turns out, they've just been *very* good at abiding by the terms of their NDA.
(And others who have reached out had similar experiences with other Christian orgs. Turns out abuse, and the use of NDAs to cover up that abuse, is rampant in a LOT of places.)