1/ So @WhyTrustTheMsm said something that gave me another idea

Drops 120-131

More overlap with the 1:20 - 1:31 drops too...

Check it out...

2/ Check out Drop 120

Unmasking
&
Em Ess Em
&
H-Arr-See
&
SA

Overlap with 1:20, 1:23, 1:29, 1:31
3/ Drop 121

Hu$$ein & MB & SA

(& r!gged eIecti0ns - worth a re-read!)

Matches 1:23 & 1:31
4/ Drop 122

H-Arr-See
&
Snow White & Godfather lll - same as 1:31

As well as “Operators active” & “Operations in US”

Strong correlations, amirite?
5/ Drops 123 & 124 & skipping to 126

+++
++
+

“Nothing is random.
Everything has meaning.”
6/ 125... not sure which skyline that is
7/ Drop 127

Graphic

1:23 talks about the map
8/ Drop 128: chock-a-block with overlap

Heavy focus on Graphic & map

future & past, then

“Disinformation is real...
Operations underway...
Snow White
Godfather lll”

Also “Disinformation” & “Distractions” are necessary

Matches 1:31 & Drop 122 closely
9/ Drop 129

“Operations” referenced again

130 - another AF1 image
10/ Drop 131 - appears to be a standalone

POTUS NATSEC E briefing

3:02am

“Please stand by”

🙏🤞🇺🇸🤞🙏

More from For later read

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.