TSMC $TSM projecting capital expenses of 25-28B USD in 2021. 80% allocated for advanced process tech, 3, 5, 7nm. 10% advanced packaging and mask making, 10% other. 2020 capex, originally slated at $15B, was over $17B. For context $AMD's entire revenue for 2020 estimated at $9.5B

Management sees a growing market and TSMC growing faster than the market, with a 2020-2025 CAGR of 10-15%. In 2019 capex was initially estimated at $10-11B and then revised up to $15B. They are expanding fast, and newer nodes are more capital intensive.
3nm looking good and has strong customer interest, production in 2H 2022.
All this, especially the capex, in line with suggestions Intel will be increasing their use of TSMC fabs, or else AMD making really large increases (or both), but they also project a lot of growth in phones
TSMC utilization rate is very high, and they expect it to remain high in Q1. They expect more revenue in Q1 than in Q4. Margin is hit by the weak USD and the large capex, but they still think a 50% gross margin is reasonable, long term.
Analyst on call surprised at raise in capex, says it is above consensus. Hmmm $INTC?
As usual, since TSMC reports before other companies, the analysts are repeatedly trying to get TSMC to give them hints about what their clients are doing, particularly to confirm what Intel is doing. TSMC management isn't answering those of course.
I'm going to need to relisten to Roland's question on the call, I might have missed a bit. Sounded like TSMC denying that they do long term supply contracts but they always "work with their customers" and build out capacity they think the market is demanding.
Interesting b/c you'd think that if Intel came in for CPUs, might contract with TSMC, i.e. build a fab and give us everything out of it. Others might also prefer this approach, but seems to be regarding Intel. TSMC made clear they don't work that way. But I didn't catch it all.
Interesting comment: TSMC used to fab mostly for phones. Starting from 2020 on, HPC jumps on, moderates seasonality with multiple big customers and market segments. Gives them confidence to increase capex.
Wow, the worst shortages are in the mature nodes, not N7 and N5. F autos, IoT, etc

I expect some inflation for autos and appliances as production is limited by the silicon shortage. Not like these fabs want to build more capacity at these nodes.
Another analyst surprised by "really huge capex", management indicates it is for increased capacity 2022, not for 2021.
Ok, I'm sold. These analysts are so blatant in asking questions that would only apply to Intel. But the sensitivity to *not* be able to answer a question about whether a customer would need to redesign a chip from their own process to TSMC, makes me really think rumors are true.
I mean, I've never done it but I would assume that definitely Intel would need to send over a specific design made for TSMC. Not being willing to blanket make that clear, I mean obviously something is up.
TSMC US fab starts construction in 2021.
Now talking about a longer lead time for EUV tools, they are buying them in advance. Good luck to anyone else getting them, I can't imagine what the lead time is after TSMC is done with their new orders.
TSMC long term plan is a mega-scale production site in Phoenix Arizona (USA), but starting with phase 1 plan of 20,000 wafers per month.

They still plan on continuing to expand in China, but a reset on the leading edge.
HPC will be the major growth driver for TSMC. Exciting changes happening, multiple architectures fighting. On N3 and N5. Not counting on cryptocurrency.
TSMC dividend will be steadily increasing. Ok, that's it, call over. Sorry if I stole your thunder @cyw60 , if you post a thread I'll link it here.
I've found @cyw60's notes to be helpful in the past https://t.co/5zD5I1bC1j
After sleeping on this, I'd like to say Intel fabbing CPUs at TSMC is not confirmed yet. There was an article from Trendforce with no sources, large capex at TSMC, and defensive answers to questions. But Trendforce could be wrong and other things could have alternate explanations
Just want to say that because the market is going to move company valuations around depending on whether or not it is true. I know that my thesis will change. If Intel is *not* fabbing CPUs (already doing other chips), there are big implications of the huge increase in capex.

More from Finance

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq

You May Also Like

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
THREAD: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ

1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE


2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less.
https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n


3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)

(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)


4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.

For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3


5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)