https://t.co/Yv854Sd3P3
https://t.co/sXaMH1bZ9m
https://t.co/5X7bOTsS7m
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
https://t.co/0AODFhRjZh
https://t.co/KggLm4rIf0
https://t.co/HLTJhsu3TB
https://t.co/QN8hClua5m
https://t.co/wO442T9wrb
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
https://t.co/sJI488WgLd
https://t.co/fUXoS5BNVJ
https://t.co/NqCJJtvXn9
https://t.co/qD8pNhUXib
https://t.co/NGJiEgVB08

More from Education

Time for some thoughts on schools given the revised SickKids document and the fact that ON decided to leave most schools closed. ON is not the only jurisdiction to do so, but important to note that many jurisdictions would not have done so -even with higher incidence rates.


As outlined in the tweet by @NishaOttawa yesterday, the situation is complex, and not a simple right or wrong https://t.co/DO0v3j9wzr. And no one needs to list all the potential risks and downsides of prolonged school closures.


On the other hand: while school closures do not directly protect our most vulnerable in long-term care at all, one cannot deny that any factor potentially increasing community transmission may have an indirect effect on the risk to these institutions, and on healthcare.

The question is: to what extend do schools contribute to transmission, and how to balance this against the risk of prolonged school closures. The leaked data from yesterday shows a mixed picture -schools are neither unicorns (ie COVID free) nor infernos.

Assuming this data is largely correct -while waiting for an official publication of the data, it shows first and foremost the known high case numbers at Thorncliff, while other schools had been doing very well -are safe- reiterating the impact of socioeconomics on the COVID risk.

You May Also Like