Come whatever event (health crisis, economic bubbles, economic recessions, political events, etc.), there should not be any doubt on business survival.
Earlier it used to be only food companies into this category, but now there are many.
Thread - How to spot a potential multibagger
Multiple fundamental parameters however we cannot be rigid on any of these parameters.
Be flexible to interpret things from bigger picture point of view.
Come whatever event (health crisis, economic bubbles, economic recessions, political events, etc.), there should not be any doubt on business survival.
Earlier it used to be only food companies into this category, but now there are many.
At any point of time, we can think with a certain common sense approach that if management wants, there can be a sustainable growth at any point of time.
Obviously this growth may come thru innovation, optimization, etc.
Management should be forward looking, should be able to read into future to build right growth avenues, should be considerate towards every stakeholder.
In addition management should be ethical & should have good social image too.
There should be a reasonable skin in the game from promoter.
If in case there is a low promoter stake, then promoter should increase stake at every possible opportunity.
Also pledging should either be zero or minimal.
Debt is becoming a dirtier word at individual level as well as at corporate level.
Lower the debt, better the valuations.
Zero debt is the biggest asset.
A company's ability to create value for shareholders is determined by its ability to generate positive cash flows, or more specifically, maximize long-term free cash flow (FCF).
Cash flow is a variable that changes with business phases
Be dynamic
Lesser the equity dilution, better will be the valuations.
Management should avoid the equity dilution at all times.
To improve the liquidity, equity dilution is good sometimes however it should be only when the proportionate growth is visible.
If company is showing earnings of 100 & giving dividend equivalent of just 10 or less, raise more doubts on such companies before building conviction.
It has been a great learning experience based on this parameter.
Thr shd be good dividend policy
More from LearnLifeWealthTravel | Dream Big, Think Growth !!
More from Economy
Thread on eminent people supporting farm laws:
Dr. Gita Gopinath, Chief Economist at IMF says "Farm bills are in right
Dr. Surjit Bhalla, executive director at IMF support farm
Godrej Agrovet Chairman Nadir Godrej tells Bloomberg that agriculture reforms are important for
Prof Ashok Gulati supports new farm
Vice-Chairman of Bharti Enterprises Rajan Bharti Mittal supports the new farm
Dr. Gita Gopinath, Chief Economist at IMF says "Farm bills are in right
Dr. Surjit Bhalla, executive director at IMF support farm
Godrej Agrovet Chairman Nadir Godrej tells Bloomberg that agriculture reforms are important for
Godrej Agrovet Chairman Nadir Godrej tells Bloomberg that agriculture reforms are important for India. pic.twitter.com/N6rnelLn0E
— BloombergQuint (@BloombergQuint) December 11, 2020
Prof Ashok Gulati supports new farm
Vice-Chairman of Bharti Enterprises Rajan Bharti Mittal supports the new farm
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
