He is a Constitution-loving registered Libertarian and who has helped the FBI fight the rampant corruption on Wall Street. He says, “I knew what the Bad Guys were going to do this Election and I had a reason to know that there was something big coming, that I won’t go into
1/25
Patrick Byrne, former CEO of Overstock. com & he’s served in executive leadership over several other large companies in the tech & manufacturing industries.
He is a Constitution-loving registered Libertarian and who has helped the FBI fight the rampant corruption on Wall Street. He says, “I knew what the Bad Guys were going to do this Election and I had a reason to know that there was something big coming, that I won’t go into
right now.” While the Democrats and the Mainstream Media have been claiming that there is “no evidence of widespread fraud” during the 2020 Elections, this is because they refuse to investigate the matter or report on it.
In fact, Tucker Carlson turned Patrick Byrne away, when Sidney Powell recommended he interview him. That’s why Byrne decided to make a spate of appearances on Independent Media, such as on Black Conservative Patriot and on The Pete Santilli Show.
- 2018 DALLAS ELECTIONS FRAUD -
In November of 2018, the Dallas elections, which were run on Dominion systems had encountered irregularities, so Texas’ state government had hired a cybersecurity firm to figure out and explore these irregularities.
This Texas cybersecurity firm has since had two years to reverse-engineer the cheated election, whereas the rest of America has only had two weeks to understand it.
Byrne had encountered this firm back in July of this year and out of civic duty, he started funding them, along with some other cybersecurity experts, hackers, private detectives, etc. to investigate Dominion Voting Systems.
He says they put together a very complete picture of the fraud that had been perpetrated during Texas’ 2018 mid-term elections. “There are at least 10 hacks to accomplish within a Dominion system. So we knew the whole plan.”
- CISA REFUSED TO BE BRIEFED ABOUT DOMINION FRAUD -
Although Byrne tried very hard to alert the Dep of Homeland Security (DHS) about their discoveries, they did not immediately accept a meeting. However, “Using some political connections, we got the meeting and started.”
Byrne then set up a follow-up classified briefing – and CISA, the Cyber Infrastructure and Security Administration – the new department within DHS, created for the purpose of protecting the digital infrastructure of the election – they REFUSED TO COME!
The State a of Texas had hired this elite cybersecurity group, a group of Federal law enforcement and military intelligence personnel to investigate the fraud in the 2018 Dallas elections – but members of CISA refused to attend!
As we know, Trump fired CISA Director, Chris Krebs last week, after Acting DHS Secretary, Chad Wolf had refused Trump’s orders to do so.
2020 FRAUD WAS IGNORED BY MSM, BROKEN BY ALT MEDIA
Byrne says they were expecting the 2020 fraud to take place and, “We knew by two days after the election EXACTLY what they had done” and how they had done it.
Since then, he’s spent the past 18 days posted up in a hotel in Washington DC, trying to bring this information to the people who would listen – and happily, this time, there are parties who are quite interested.
He says, they’ve had a breakthrough since last Sunday (11/15). “Everybody gets it here. Everyone around the President, in Rudy Giuliani’s circles and in Sidney Powell’s circles. ( explains the presidents "over" convidence since the election )
Of course, the Mainstream Media is trying to bury this in concrete, so Byrne says that about three days ago, he decided to go to the Independent Media.
Byrne says, this will go down as the Mainstream Media’s final “black mark”, because, in a month or two, it will be clear to everyone that they took part in a cover-up.
“They took part in a psychological operation, frankly, to try and get Americans to accept ‘President-Elect’ Joe Biden, when there’s way, way too many questions.” He says Americans will see very clearly that the MSM was engaged in propaganda rather than seeking the truth.
- WHAT HAPPENED AT FRANKFURT? -
On the night of the 2020 Election, Byrne’s team found that data from the voting machines was going to Frankfurt, Germany. This was corroborated by a German professor,
who noted the extraordinary amount of traffic going to Frankfurt IPs during the hours of the US Election. Byrne says the US Consulate in Frankfurt is significant because there had been an operation there against the Russian hacking groups,
Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, of Mueller Report infamy. Byrne says that this Frankfurt operation was moved to Baltimore Station, for the Silk Road Task Force, which led to the conviction of Ross Ulbricht, who was sentenced to two life sentences plus 40 years, without the
possibility of parole for selling hard drugs online, followed by the convictions of two members of this same Silk Road Task Force, DEA Agent, Carl Force and Secret Service Agent, Shaun Bridges who were each sentenced to 7 years for defrauding both the government AND
Ulbricht out of well over $1M in Bitcoin during the course of their investigations of Ulbricht for the US Government. Byrne notes that Rod Rosenstein was the US Attorney for the District of Maryland at the time.
More from Economy
Long rant: This @WSJ article bemoaning the decline of price theory is really worth highlighting. The economic theories and so called "laws of economics" that the WSJ consistently and religiously defends, are the source of their authority, power and privilege.
So called economic "theories" like "you get paid exactly what you are worth" and "markets are perfectly efficient" and "when wages rise, jobs fall" and "raising taxes on the rich kills jobs and growth" and "increasing justice decreases economic efficiency" and...
"Government intervention in markets always creates more harm than good" and "any regulation that constrains corporations kills growth and productivity", etc etc are effectively a protection racket for the rich. It is a set of internally consistent and mathematized conjectures...
That are all demonstrably nonsense. But getting people to accept these "theories" as laws of nature and immutable, timeless truths is the most effective way our current economic elites have found to maintain and enhance the status of the powerful and persuade the weak and poor...
to shut the fuck up and accept their lot in life. Now, FINALLY, some economists- are actually beginning to look at the real world evidence to determine whether these propositions actually describe anything real here on planet earth. Let me save you some time. The answer is NO.
Hilarious. The WSJ editorial page bemoans the waning influence of The neoliberal priesthood, and hence their own. https://t.co/pQT8Dstg8I
— Nick Hanauer (@NickHanauer) January 28, 2021
So called economic "theories" like "you get paid exactly what you are worth" and "markets are perfectly efficient" and "when wages rise, jobs fall" and "raising taxes on the rich kills jobs and growth" and "increasing justice decreases economic efficiency" and...
"Government intervention in markets always creates more harm than good" and "any regulation that constrains corporations kills growth and productivity", etc etc are effectively a protection racket for the rich. It is a set of internally consistent and mathematized conjectures...
That are all demonstrably nonsense. But getting people to accept these "theories" as laws of nature and immutable, timeless truths is the most effective way our current economic elites have found to maintain and enhance the status of the powerful and persuade the weak and poor...
to shut the fuck up and accept their lot in life. Now, FINALLY, some economists- are actually beginning to look at the real world evidence to determine whether these propositions actually describe anything real here on planet earth. Let me save you some time. The answer is NO.
One of the hardest problems post-pandemic will be how to revive so-called "left behind" places.
Post-industrial towns, run-down suburbs, coastal communities - these places were already struggling before the crisis and have fared worst in the last year.
What should we do?
Today, @ukonward sets out the beginning of a plan to repair our social fabric. It follows our extensive research over the last year, expertly chaired by @jamesosh, and funded by @jrf_uk, @Shelter and @peoplesbiz.
https://t.co/d3T5uPwG9N
Before I get into recommendations, some findings from previous Onward research.
In 2018, we found 71% of people believe "community has declined in my lifetime"
In 2019, we found 65% would rather live in “a society that focuses on giving people more security” vs 35% for freedom
This was the basis for our identification of 'Workington Man' as the archetypal swing voter in 2019, and led us to predict (correctly) that large numbers of Red Wall seats could fall. A key driver was a desire for security, belonging and pride in place.
There is also a key regional dimension to this. We also tested people's affinity with the UK's direction of travel, across both cultural and economic dimensions - revealing the extraordinary spread below: London vs. the Rest.
https://t.co/HrorW4xaLp
Post-industrial towns, run-down suburbs, coastal communities - these places were already struggling before the crisis and have fared worst in the last year.
What should we do?
Today, @ukonward sets out the beginning of a plan to repair our social fabric. It follows our extensive research over the last year, expertly chaired by @jamesosh, and funded by @jrf_uk, @Shelter and @peoplesbiz.
https://t.co/d3T5uPwG9N
Before I get into recommendations, some findings from previous Onward research.
In 2018, we found 71% of people believe "community has declined in my lifetime"
In 2019, we found 65% would rather live in “a society that focuses on giving people more security” vs 35% for freedom
This was the basis for our identification of 'Workington Man' as the archetypal swing voter in 2019, and led us to predict (correctly) that large numbers of Red Wall seats could fall. A key driver was a desire for security, belonging and pride in place.
There is also a key regional dimension to this. We also tested people's affinity with the UK's direction of travel, across both cultural and economic dimensions - revealing the extraordinary spread below: London vs. the Rest.
https://t.co/HrorW4xaLp
You May Also Like
Krugman is, of course, right about this. BUT, note that universities can do a lot to revitalize declining and rural regions.
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
One thing I've been noticing about responses to today's column is that many people still don't get how strong the forces behind regional divergence are, and how hard to reverse 1/ https://t.co/Ft2aH1NcQt
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 20, 2018
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.