It's out! The @EU_Commission winter economic forecast for 2021 📊
🇪🇸 +5.6% GDP
🇫🇷 +5.5% GDP
🇭🇷 +5.6% GDP
🇸🇮 +4.7% GDP
🇲🇹 +4.5% GDP
🇵🇹 +4.1% GDP
🇸🇰 +4.0% GDP
🇭🇺 +4.0% GDP
🇧🇪 +3.9% GDP
🇷🇴 +3.8% GDP
💶 +3.8% GDP
🇪🇺 +3.7% GDP
🇬🇷 +3.5% GDP
🇱🇻 +3.5% GDP
🇮🇪 +3.4% GDP
🇮🇹 +3.2% GDP

🇩🇪 +3.2% GDP
🇨🇾 +3.2% GDP
🇱🇺 +3.2% GDP
🇨🇿 +3.2% GDP
🇵🇱 +3.1% GDP
🇩🇰 +2.9% GDP
🇫🇮 +2.8% GDP
🇧🇬 +2.7% GDP
🇸🇪 +2.7% GDP
🇪🇪 +2.6% GDP
🇱🇹 +2.2% GDP
🇦🇹 +2.0% GDP
🇳🇱 +1.8% GDP
Vs📈 2020:

🇪🇸 -11.0% GDP
🇬🇷 -10.0% GDP
🇲🇹 - 9.0% GDP
🇭🇷 - 8.9% GDP
🇮🇹 - 8.8% GDP
🇫🇷 - 8.3% GDP
🇵🇹 - 7.6% GDP
🇦🇹 - 7.4% GDP
💶 - 6.8% GDP
🇪🇺 - 6.3% GDP
🇧🇪 - 6.2% GDP
🇸🇮 - 6.2% GDP
🇸🇰 - 5.9% GDP
🇨🇾 - 5.8% GDP
🇨🇿 - 5.7% GDP
🇭🇺 - 5.3% GDP
🇩🇪 - 5.0% GDP
🇷🇴 - 5.0% GDP
🇧🇬 - 4.9% GDP
🇳🇱 - 4.1% GDP
🇱🇻 - 3.5% GDP
🇩🇰 - 3.5% GDP
🇱🇺 - 3.1% GDP
🇫🇮 - 3.1% GDP
🇮🇪 - 3.0% GDP
🇪🇪 - 2.9% GDP
🇸🇪 - 2.9% GDP
🇵🇱 - 2.8% GDP
🇱🇹 - 0.9% GDP
Commissioner @PaoloGentiloni says the forecast is based on the assumption that restrictive measures to contain the #coronavirus will be eased in the second quarter of 2021.
👀By the way, this is the first time the Commission economic forecast does not include data for the 🇬🇧UK after the effective end of the transition period on December 31.
Commissioner says the forecast does not take into consideration the potential positive impact of the #EUrecovery fund because the Commission has no way yet to measure it just yet.
Commissioner @PaoloGentiloni warns on the long-term impact on employment and growing inequalities as a result of the crisis -especially gender inequalities.
EVP @VDombrovskis message on the economic forecast: "While we can be cautiously optimistic, uncertainty remains."
👉Commission calculates around -0.5% GDP #Brexit impact for the🇪🇺EU's growth, up to -2.2% GDP for the 🇬🇧UK until the end of 2022.
** Correction:

🇮🇪Ireland's GDP in 2020 was actually +3.0%.

Sorry about that!

More from Economy

Let's discuss how little you actually understand about economics and energy.

The first thing to understand is that energy is not globally fungible. Electricity decays as it leaves its point of origin; it’s expensive to transport. There is a huge excess (hydro) in many areas.


In other words, it can also be variable. It's estimated that in Sichuan there is twice as much electricity produced as is needed during the rainy season. Indeed, there is seasonality to how Bitcoin mining works. You can see here:

Bitcoin EXPORTS energy in this scenario. Fun fact, most industrial nations would steer this excess capacity towards refining aluminum by melting bauxite ore, which is very energy intensive.

You wouldn't argue that we are producing *too much* electricity from renewables, right?

"But what about the carbon footprint! ITS HUGE!"

Many previous estimates have quite faulty methods and don't take into account the actual energy sources. Is it fair to put a GHG equivalent on hydro or solar power? That would seem a bit disingenuous, no?

Well that's exactly what some have done.

You May Also Like