Categories Culture
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
It's a mistake, and besides impossible, to search for "the first trans novel", however you define any of the terms.
So here's a deliciously incomplete list of novels in English by and about trans people, up to 2010, to highly variable definitions of "trans" and "novel".
Jack Saul, The Sins of the Cities of the Plain (1881)
https://t.co/nMby1oWmV5
Major work of gay/trans porn writing. Probably not by the actual John Saul, sex worker and occasional cross-dresser. Features the infamous Fanny and Stella, who were very trans:
Rachilde, Monsieur Vénus (1884, English tr. 2005)
https://t.co/Ni2jYupQEu
Erotic novel of an abusive BDSM relationship which propels both characters into gender ambiguity, by a writer with strong but complicated male identification and presentation.
Irene Clyde, Beatrice the Sixteenth (1909)
https://t.co/0glyOrWdqk
Speculative fiction about a postgender (but very femme) society, by a lawyer, writer, feminist, pacifist, traitor and war crime apologist who expressed a lifelong desire to be a woman.
John Radclyffe Hall, The Well of Loneliness (1928)
https://t.co/du4qeItptV
Novel of sexual inversion, a sexology category combining sexuality & gender, by an invert who preferred the name John.
Dare you to go on telly claiming this as the 1st trans novel with a major publisher.
So here's a deliciously incomplete list of novels in English by and about trans people, up to 2010, to highly variable definitions of "trans" and "novel".
Jack Saul, The Sins of the Cities of the Plain (1881)
https://t.co/nMby1oWmV5
Major work of gay/trans porn writing. Probably not by the actual John Saul, sex worker and occasional cross-dresser. Features the infamous Fanny and Stella, who were very trans:
Rachilde, Monsieur Vénus (1884, English tr. 2005)
https://t.co/Ni2jYupQEu
Erotic novel of an abusive BDSM relationship which propels both characters into gender ambiguity, by a writer with strong but complicated male identification and presentation.
Irene Clyde, Beatrice the Sixteenth (1909)
https://t.co/0glyOrWdqk
Speculative fiction about a postgender (but very femme) society, by a lawyer, writer, feminist, pacifist, traitor and war crime apologist who expressed a lifelong desire to be a woman.
John Radclyffe Hall, The Well of Loneliness (1928)
https://t.co/du4qeItptV
Novel of sexual inversion, a sexology category combining sexuality & gender, by an invert who preferred the name John.
Dare you to go on telly claiming this as the 1st trans novel with a major publisher.
In case you missed it, my creepy stalker @DineshDSouza is back, repeating his bizarre claim that "progressive historians" never write about how the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
Let's all dig in on this
It's a laughable claim, as anyone who took US history in college or even high school knows, but it seems D'Souza never did that.
He's been pushing it for years, and whenever I ask him for examples -- like this thread from July 2018 -- he runs away.
D'Souza has repeatedly promised he'll show examples of this trend he insists is incredibly widespread -- examples that are surely at his fingertips! -- but it's been years now.
(He *does* apparently have plenty time to tell everyone else in his replies how very important he is.)
Perhaps we can all help D'Souza out here by identifying any "progressive textbooks" that do, in fact, acknowledge the Democrats' past ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
That way, he can rule those suspects out and move more quickly on to the others.
I'll start.
Howard Zinn probably looms large when people think of leftist histories of the US, so let's start there.
"Democrats were the party of slavery and segregation."
Huh, seems like Zinn gave up the secret. Well, he's probably the only one.
Let's all dig in on this
Progressive historians like Kevin Kruse say the 1776 Commission Report leaves a lot out. Yes, but not half as much as these guys leave out themselves to protect their party's horrific history of enslavement, lynching, segregation & mass murder. @KevinMKruse @rauchway @KevinLevin pic.twitter.com/mBMAt5rIwj
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 22, 2021
It's a laughable claim, as anyone who took US history in college or even high school knows, but it seems D'Souza never did that.
He's been pushing it for years, and whenever I ask him for examples -- like this thread from July 2018 -- he runs away.
Please name the textbooks that attribute segregation laws to anyone other than Southern Democrats. https://t.co/zirKIip3BR
— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) July 30, 2018
D'Souza has repeatedly promised he'll show examples of this trend he insists is incredibly widespread -- examples that are surely at his fingertips! -- but it's been years now.
(He *does* apparently have plenty time to tell everyone else in his replies how very important he is.)
Perhaps we can all help D'Souza out here by identifying any "progressive textbooks" that do, in fact, acknowledge the Democrats' past ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
That way, he can rule those suspects out and move more quickly on to the others.
I'll start.
Howard Zinn probably looms large when people think of leftist histories of the US, so let's start there.
"Democrats were the party of slavery and segregation."
Huh, seems like Zinn gave up the secret. Well, he's probably the only one.